A comparison between Hybrid external fixator + limited fixation with small incision and traditional plate fixation in the treatment of the tibial plateau fracture

Yong HUANG,Zhi-qiang CAO,Jian-wen MA,Ze-qing LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2018.03.007
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare Hybrid external fixator + limited fixation with small incision and traditional plate fixation in the treatment of the tibial plateau fracture. Methods From January 2015 to January 2017, 60 patients with Schatzker fracture type IV ( 15 cases ), V ( 30 cases ), VI ( 15 cases ) were selected. There were 40 males and 20 females. The mean age was ( 42.7 ± 8.9 ) years ( range: 19 - 54 years ). Twenty cases were of traffic accident injury, 25 cases of falling injury, and 15 cases of fall over injury. Patients with complete rupture of the collateral ligaments and anterior cruciate ligaments, compartment syndrome, nerve or vascular injury, and other serious chronic diseases were excluded. According to surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups: Hybrid external fixator group ( Group A, n = 30, 20 males and 10 females ); open reduction and internal fixation group ( Group B, n = 30, 19 males and 11 females ). Results Sixty patients were followed up for 6 to 9 months ( average: 8 months ). Significant differences ( P < 0.05 ) existed in the mean operative time ( P = 0.038 ), mean operative blood loss ( P = 0.042 ) and mean fracture healing time ( P = 0.016 ). No significant differences ( P > 0.05 ) existed in RRS ( P = 0.27 ), lysholm ( P = 0.14 ), skin necrosis rate ( P = 0.16 ) and wound infection rate ( P = 0.18 ). Conclusions Clinical results of Hybrid external fixator + limited fixation with small incision are more satisfactory than the traditional plate fixation in the treatment of the tibial plateau fracture. It shortens the healing time, lowers the infection rate, simplifies the operation , which is also less invasive.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?