Comparative research of Kirschner wire technique and electric drill-assisted pedicle screw installation in lumbar scoliosis

Huang YAN,Zhen LIU,Wei-fei WU,Ze-zhang ZHU,Yong QIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2016.06.011
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the accuracy and safety of the “electric drill -assisted” technique in placing lumbar pedicle screw ( LPS ), comparing with the conventional “freehand” technique. Methods A total of 157 patients ( 48 males and 109 females ) with lumbar scoliosis were included in the study from January 2008 to December 2011. The average age was ( 14.6 ± 5.8 ) years ( range: 9 - 19 years ). The patients were divided into Kirschner wire ( free hand ) group ( n = 85 ) and electric drill-assisted group ( n = 72 ) according to different methods of canal preparation. Post-operative computed tomography ( CT ) was acquired to determine the distribution of the cortical perforation and the distance between the screw tip and cortical perforation. χ2 test was performed to compare the differences of 2 groups on the convex side and concave side. Results All 1118 lumbar pedicle screws were inserted in 157 patients with scoliosis. The incidence of cortical perforation was 9.3%. Sixty-four of 642 screws ( 10.0% ) perforated cortices in the free hand group, 40 of 476 screws ( 8.4% ) perforated cortices in the electric drill-assisted group. No significant differences of the perforation rate were found between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05 ). In the electric drill-assisted group, the incidence of cortical perforation was 9.7% ( 23 / 236 ) on the convex side and 7.1% ( 17 / 240 ) on the concave side. In the free hand group, the incidence of cortical perforation was 8.8% ( 28 / 317 ) on the convex side and 11.1%( 36 / 325 ) on the concave side. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05 ). No neurological, vascular, or visceral complications caused by LPS placement occurred in both groups. Conclusions The electric drill-assisted technique shows similar accuracy and safety in placing LPS, comparing with the conventional Kirschner wire technique.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?