Long-term revision after prosthetic replacement for the patients with tumors in the distal femur:three cases report

Hong-liang YAN,Yang DONG,Zhi-chang ZHANG,Huan-zhi MA,Chun-lin ZHANG,Qing-cheng YANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2014.05.016
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To report revision surgery in 3 patients with tumors in the distal femur who underwent prosthetic replacement 25 years ago and to summarize the experience of revision surgery because of long-time loosening of the tumor prosthesis in the distal femur. Methods A total of 3 patients underwent prosthetic revision from January 2008 to December 2012, due to loosening in the distal femur after prosthetic replacement 25 years ago. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, including the clinical symptoms ( pain around the knee and walking difficulties ), imaging manifestations ( prosthetic loosening and migration and prosthetic position after revision surgery based on the X-ray ), operation methods and techniques, postoperative functional recovery and so on. All the 3 patients were followed up for at least 5 years. Results The clinical symptoms of the 3 patients were improved after revision surgery, with pain relief around the knee. The postoperative X-ray showed the joint position was good. No complications such as prosthetic loosening, migration or breakage were noticed during the follow-up. According to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society ( MSTS 1993 ) staging system, their postoperative functional scores were 70%, 80%and 73.3%. The postoperative functional recovery of all the patients was satisfactory and no local tumor recurrence or metastasis was noticed. Conclusions The tumor prosthesis is durable. However, the complications such as loosening, infection or rejection may occur. It is relatively easy to pull out the prosthesis and the bone cement in revision surgery due to long-term loosening of the tumor prosthesis. After primary prosthetic replacement, a lot of scar tissues and even biological pseudomembranes will be formed around the prosthesis. Biological pseudomembranes should be resected as completely as possible. Muscle lfap transplantation should be prepared for the patients with soft tissue defects during the revision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?