Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: Outcomes of 3-Year Follow-Up

Du Xiao,Fu Xianghui,Shi Lei,Zhuang Hua,Hu Jiankun,Zhou Zongguang,Cheng Zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.06.004
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective A retrospective cohort study with 3-year follow-up aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of LSG with LRYGB for morbid obesity. Methods From Jan. 2009 to May. 2013, 74 patients undergoing LRYGB and 82 patients undergoing LSG were enrolled in this study. Major complications, BMI, and percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) after 12, 24, and 36 months were compared. Results The preoperative characters of patients between two groups were comparable. Hospital stay and operative time in LSG was significantly shorter than LRYGB group, and there was no significant difference of major complications. No significant differences in mean percentage of excess weight loss, EWL% and BMI were observed at 12, 24 months. At 3-year follow-up, mean EWL% in the LRYGB group was significantly higher than in the LSG group [(74.7±8.3)% vs (69.1±10.7)%] and, consequently, mean BMI was significantly lower in LRYGB [(28.3 ± 1.6) kg/m2vs (28.9 ± 1.8) kg/m2,P<0.05]. Conclusions LSG were safe and effective bariatric procedures compared with LRYGB, but LRYGB was superior to LSG in terms of mid-term weight loss. Key words: Bariatric surgery; Morbid obesity; Weight loss; Sleeve gastrectomy; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
What problem does this paper attempt to address?