Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of debridement, local application of povidone iodine and retention of prosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).Methods From April 2011 to August 2015, a retrospective analysis including 28 acute PJIs in Changhai Hospital was performed.Inclusion criteria: primary hip or knee replacement, diagnosed PJI through joint fluid culture or intraoperative pathological test, and the onset was less than four weeks, with no sinus formation.The exclusion criteria was the patients complained of iodine allergy.The treatment consisted of debridement and soaked with povidone iodine at least 20.0 min.The modular part of the joint was exchanged and adequate antibiotics were routinely administrated.SPSS 20 software was used to compare the functional scores before and after the operation with repeated measures analysis of variance.The functional scores including Harris scores, hospital for special surgery(HSS)scores, and University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA) scores.Results The mean follow-up period was (48±16) months, and 25 of the 28 cases had no evidence of persistent infection and were no longer on antibiotics at the most recent follow-up.The average Harris score was (94.2±2.3) for the THA group, and the average HSS score was (94.5±2.5) for the TKA group.All the functional scores were significant improved following the debridement compared with the preoperative ones (all P<0.05).All the failures occurred in the TKA group who underwent two stage replacements.Conclusion Compared with the literature results of debridement, retention of prosthesis in the treatment of acute PJI, the addition of local application of povidone iodine may impove the infection control rate, but a large group and long time follow-up is needed.

Clinical experience of implant retention in prosthetic joint infections with local application of povidone iodine