Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treatment of chronic refractory wounds

Ming Li,Junhui Zhang,Shumin Li,Zhenglin Di,Zhiyong He,Weitao Jia,Ting Yuan,Changqing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2016.06.008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine the safety and effectiveness of treating chronic refractory wounds with platelet-rich plasma ( PRP) and to evaluate its antibacterial effect in vitro .Methods From September 2010 to December 2014, 21 patients of chronic refractory wounds were treated with 2 -7 ml PRP.The patients included eight males and 13 females, aged from 48 to 78 years (58.5 ±12).The bacterial culture results , wound healing size and rates were analyzed for treatment efficacy evaluation .The wound deterioration , aggravated infection , bacteremia , wound recurrence and other adverse reactions were recorded to evaluate the safety of this treatment .The patients were clinically prospectively evaluated before the treatment and at one , two, four and 12-week follow-up. As the most common seen strains , staphylococcus aureus was selected to be incubated in PRP and PRP gel .Staphylococcus aureus were sampled and compared at multiple time points .Results No complication such as wound deterioration , aggravated infection , bacteremia , wound recurrence , or other major adverse events occurred .Only two weeks after PRP injection , chronic wounds contracted significantly in 21 patients with purulence and&nbsp;necrosis tissue cleaned up , circulation of soft tissue improved and exposed bone or muscle tissue covered by neogenetic granulation .The wound sizes in one , two and four weeks of the follow-up, were (5.5 ±3.9) ml, (3.5 ±2.9) ml and (2.0 ±2.1) ml, respectively.The chronic wounds proportion decreased to (55.1 ± 22.6)%, ( 72.0 ±16.2 )%, ( 84.3 ±14.0 )% after the PRP therapy when compared with the preoperative data , which showed significant difference ( P<0.05) .Three months after the PRP injection , the average coverage rate was (85.6 ±12.5)%, when compared with (84.3 ±14.0)% at the 4th week after the therapy, which showed no significant difference (P >0.05).The cure rate and subjective satisfaction rate were 57.1% and 95.23%, respectively.In vitro experiment showed PRP gel presenting the strongest antibacterial effect , the number of bacteria decreased to a minimum after 4 h incubation . Conclusion The results of this study indicate that PRP is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic non-healing wounds , while the potential anti-bacterial effects need more well-designed studies to confirm .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?