Abstract:Background: Measures of lumbar lordosis (LL) and elliptical modeling variables have been shown to discriminate between normal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Pelvic morphology influences an individual's sagittal lumbar alignment. Our purpose is to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of lumbar sagittal radiographic alignment and modeling variables to identify if these can discriminate between normal controls and CLBP patients. Methods: We conducted a computer analysis of digitized vertebral body corners on lateral lumbar radiographs of normal controls and CLBP patients. Fifty normal controls were attained from a required pre-employment physical examination (29 men; 21 women; mean age of 27.7 ± 8.5 years), with no history of low back pain, a normal spinal examination, no pathologies, anomalies, or instability. Additionally, 50 CLBP patients (29 men; 29.5 ± 8 years of age) were randomly chosen and matched to the characteristics of the controls. The inclusion criteria required no abnormalities on lumbar spine radiographs. The parameters included the following: ARA L1-L5 lordosis, ARA T12-S1 lordosis, Cobb T12-S1, b/a elliptical modelling ratio, sacral base angle (SBA), and S1 posterior tangent to vertical (PTS1). Two measures of pelvic morphology were determined for each person—the angle of pelvic incidence (API) and posterior tangent pelvic incidence angle (PTPIA)—and the relationships between API − ARA T12-S1, API − Cobb T12-S1, and API − ARA L1-5 was determined. Descriptive statistics and correlations among the primary variables were determined. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) for primary variables were analyzed. Results: The mean values of LL were statistically different between the normal and CLBP groups (p 0.05). API had a stronger correlation to the SBA and Cobb T12-S1 than PTPIA did, while PTPIA had a stronger correlation to the S1 tangent and ARA T12-S1 than API did. While CLBP patients had a stronger correlation of ARA T12-S1 and Cobb T12-S1 relative to the pelvic morphology, they also had a reduced correlation of ARA L1-L5 lordosis relative to their SBA and pelvic morphology measures. API − T12-S1, API − L1-L5, and API − Cobb T12-S1 were statistically different between the groups, p < 0.001. Using ROC curve analyses, it was identified that ARA L1-L5 lordosis of 36° and ARA T12-S1 of 68° have a good sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between normal and CLBP patients. ROC curve analyses identified that lordosis ARAT12-S1 < 68° (AUC = 0.83), lordosis ARAL1-L5 < 36° (AUC = 0.78), API − ARA T12-S1 35° (AUC = 0.71), and API − Cobb T12-S1 < −5° (AUC = 0.69) had moderate to good discrimination between groups (AUC = 0.83, 0.78, 0.75, and 0.72). Conclusions: Pelvic morphology is similar between normal and CLBP patients. CLBP patients have an abnormal 'fit' of their API − ARAT12-S1 and L1-L5 lumbar lordosis relative to their pelvic morphology and sacral tilt shown as a hypolordosis.

Preliminary study of spinal-pelvic sagittal alignment and its relationship with lumbar pain in patients with end-stage primary hip osteoarthritis

Characteristics of Sagittal Spine-Pelvis-Leg Alignment in Patients with Severe Hip Osteoarthritis Comorbid with Low Back Pain

Sagittal Alignment of the Spine-Pelvis-lower Extremity Axis in Patients with Severe Knee Osteoarthritis

Impact of the hip osteoarthritis on sagittal spine–pelvis alignment parameters in lumbar spinal stenosis with sagittal malalignment: a propensity score matching study

The Effect of Total Hip Arthroplasty on Sagittal Spinal–pelvic–leg Alignment and Low Back Pain in Patients with Severe Hip Osteoarthritis

The Effect of Total Hip Arthroplasty on Preoperative Low Back Pain in Secondary Hip-Spine Syndrome: A Radiographic Study

Relationship between spinal imbalance and knee osteoarthritis by using full-body EOS

The low back pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis: current knowledge on the diagnosis, mechanism and treatment outcome

Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain

Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Radiological severity of hip osteoarthritis in patients with adult spinal deformity: the effect on spinopelvic and lower extremity compensatory mechanisms

The relationship between global spinal alignment and pelvic orientation from standing to sitting following pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis

The Influence of Long-Term Shoulder Loading on Sagittal Spino-Pelvic Morphology: a Population-Based Retrospective Study of Chinese Farmers from Radiology

Sagittal Parameters of Spine‐Pelvis‐Hip Joints in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The correlation between the sagittal lumbopelvic alignments in standing position and the risk factors influencing low back pain

Revealing the Effect of Spinopelvic Alignment on Hip Disorders

Can the Mismatch of Measured Pelvic Morphology vs. Lumbar Lordosis Predict Chronic Low Back Pain Patients?

Relationship between spinal sagittal alignment and acetabular coverage: a patient-matched control study

Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions

Correlation analysis between postoperative hip pain and spino-pelvic/hip parameters in adult scoliosis patients after long-segment spinal fusion

Comparative Study of Preoperative Sagittal Spinal Pelvic Alignment in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy