Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2016 to June 2018. These patients include 33 males and 82 females, ranging in age from 41 to 72 years, with a mean of (57±7) years. 56 cases (posterior interbody fusion group) were treated by intermuscular approach and 59 cases (oblique lateral interbody fusion group) were treated by oblique lateral approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, imaging results, clinical results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up with an average of (27±3) months (range from 12 to 48 months). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of oblique lateral interbody fusion group were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (P<0.05). There was no incision infection and nerve injury were observed in two groups. Besides, the VAS score at 72 h after surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion group (1.10±0.08) were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (1.51±0.15). According to the analysis of variance with repeated measures design, the difference between the posterior group and the oblique lateral fusion group was statistically significant in terms of lumbar lordosis angle and spondylolisthesis rate at postoperation and the last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between different groups in spondylolisthesis angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space height. Both the two groups showed significant improvement in ODI during the final follow-up (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the posterior fusion group was significantly higher than in the oblique lateral fusion group (P<0.05). The fusion rate of posterior interbody fusion group was 96.4% and 94.9% in oblique lateral interbody fusion group, while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up, loosening, displacement, breakage of pedicle screw, displacement of intervertebral cages or obvious degeneration of adjacent segments were not observed.Conclusions:The posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and the oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation take well clinical results for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ ). Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach takes advantages of quick operation, less trauma, less bleeding, high safety, quick recovery and no interference to spinal canal, which can be a good choice for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).

Clinical comparative study of short pedicle screws in treatment of single-segment lumbar and sacral vertebral lesion by posterior fixation surgery

Posterior debridement and internal fixation for ultralong segmental tuberculosis in thoracic and lumbar vertebra through cross-window

Clinical Comprehension of Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture Treatmented with Posterior Monosegmental Vertebral Pedicle Screw Fixation at the Injured Vetebrae

GSS pedicle screw system and interbody autogenous iliac bone graft fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Short-segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Polymethyl Methacrylate Vertebroplasty in Treating Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Compression Fractures

Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Transpedicular Interbody Bone Grafting for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

Development of a new screw with porous sides and its long-term efficacy for internal fixation of lumbar spondylolysis

Pedicle screw internal fixation combined with intra-vertebral bone graft for thoracolumbar fractures

Application of cortical bone trajectory screw in the revision of lumbar disease

Posterior short-segmental pedicle screw fixation in treatment of 186 patients with single-level thoracolumbar burst fracture without nerologic deficit

Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Scoliosis with Segmental Pedical Screw

Comparison of short-segment and long-segment fixation in treatment of degenerative scoliosis and analysis of factors associated with adjacent spondylolisthesis

[Effect of posterior lumbar fusion on the degeneration of adjacent segments using cortical bone trajectory screw fixation]

Transforaminal Debridement with a Posterior-Only Approach Involving Placement of an Interbody Bone Graft Combined with Diseased Vertebral Fixation for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis

Safety and Efficacy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Combined with Facet Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Posterior short-segmental fixation combined with intermediate screws vs conventional intersegmental fixation for monosegmental thoracolumbar fractures.

[Case Control Studies on Unilateral or Bilateral Pedicle Fixation at the Level of Fracture Versus Posterior Fixation Alone in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures].

Comparative study of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparative effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screws and pedicle screws in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis