Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2016 to June 2018. These patients include 33 males and 82 females, ranging in age from 41 to 72 years, with a mean of (57±7) years. 56 cases (posterior interbody fusion group) were treated by intermuscular approach and 59 cases (oblique lateral interbody fusion group) were treated by oblique lateral approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, imaging results, clinical results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up with an average of (27±3) months (range from 12 to 48 months). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of oblique lateral interbody fusion group were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (P<0.05). There was no incision infection and nerve injury were observed in two groups. Besides, the VAS score at 72 h after surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion group (1.10±0.08) were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (1.51±0.15). According to the analysis of variance with repeated measures design, the difference between the posterior group and the oblique lateral fusion group was statistically significant in terms of lumbar lordosis angle and spondylolisthesis rate at postoperation and the last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between different groups in spondylolisthesis angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space height. Both the two groups showed significant improvement in ODI during the final follow-up (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the posterior fusion group was significantly higher than in the oblique lateral fusion group (P<0.05). The fusion rate of posterior interbody fusion group was 96.4% and 94.9% in oblique lateral interbody fusion group, while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up, loosening, displacement, breakage of pedicle screw, displacement of intervertebral cages or obvious degeneration of adjacent segments were not observed.Conclusions:The posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and the oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation take well clinical results for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ ). Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach takes advantages of quick operation, less trauma, less bleeding, high safety, quick recovery and no interference to spinal canal, which can be a good choice for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).

The Role of the Telamon Fusion Technique in the Treatment of the Instability of Low Lumbar Spine

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

Long-term Result of Posterior 360 Degree Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Instability of Lumbar Spine

Surgery strategy for grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ spondylolisthesis in adults

Posterior Circumferential Fusion for the Mechanical Instability of Lumbar Spine

[Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion].

[360 Degrees Fixation of Lumbar Spine].

[Clinical Value of Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assisted by X-Tube System in the Treatment of Low Back Disorders].

Application of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Thoracolumbar Fracture

Transpedicular reduction and stabilization for postlaminectomy lumbar instability

Topping-off Surgery Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion for Combined One-level Spondylolisthesis and Adjacent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Study of Clinical Efficacy and Radiographic Outcomes With a Two-year Follow-up

Surgical treatment of the old thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

Treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with posterior decompression,spinal fusion and pedicle screws instrumentation

Surgical treatment of degenerative low lumbar instability

[Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation with Lumbar Instability].

Effect of Posterolateral Fusion on Thoracolumbar Burs Fractures

Clinical Study of Posterior Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

The Treatment of Lumbar Spondyolisthesis with Interverterbral Theaded Fusion Cage (TFC) and Pedicle Screw Reduction and Fixation System

Surgical decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis complicated by lumbar instability: Retrospective analysis of 181 cases

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Traumatic Lumbar Spondylolisthesis