Retrospective analysis of radiological investigation of surgically excised head and neck lipomas
Amy L. Schranz,Fiona Riordan,Roisin Dolan,Catriona Lawlor,Colin Morrison,Gary O’Toole,Ronan Killeen,Graeme McNeill,Rory O’Donohoe,Tom Moran,Fergal O’Duffy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08672-3
2024-05-13
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose Differentiating benign lipomas from malignant causes is challenging and preoperative investigative guidelines are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify cases of head and neck lipomas that were surgically resected over a 5-year period and to identify the radiological modality chosen and features discussed in the final report. Multidisciplinary outcomes and pathology reports were examined with a view to identifying high risk features of a lipoma to aid in future risk stratification. Methods Retrospective chart review of pathology characteristics, radiological features (modality, size, calcifications, septations, globular/nodular foci), multidisciplinary discussion and history of presenting complaint was performed. Results Two liposarcomas and 138 lipomas were identified. Twenty-two percent of all lipomas received radiological investigation. Twenty-two percent of imaging referrals were possibly inappropriate. Furthermore, radiological features suggestive of malignancy were not present in the final radiology report, X 2 = 28.8, p < 0.0001. Conclusion As expected, the incidence of liposarcoma is low. There is limited awareness of radiology referral guidelines superimposed with a tendency to over-investigate lipomas. Furthermore, radiological features suggestive of malignancy were inconsistently reported on and not documented in multidisciplinary discussions. Therefore, we propose a multidisciplinary checklist for referring physicians and radiologists to aid in diagnostic work-up.
otorhinolaryngology