Abstract:Background: Neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal approach for resection of pituitary adenomas has the advantages of less damage, fewer complications, and a faster recovery than the traditional approach and has beening favored by neurosurgeons. However, there has no standard method of selecting suitable packing materials after the operation to relieve pain in patients and achieve the ideal hemostatic effect. We compared the postoperative complications and treatment effects of two different packing materials in patients with pituitary adenomas. Objective: To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of using a catheter balloon and iodoform gauze for hemostasis in patients undergoing pituitary tumor resection by neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal approach. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed these data of 48 cases treated with pituitary adenoma resection by the single nasal approach from January 2018 to October 2019 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. According to the type of sphenoid sinus packing material used, these patients were divided into balloon tamponade oppression group (24 cases) and tela iodoformum oppression group (24 cases), respectively. The balloon tamponade oppression group received catheter balloon tamponade oppression hemostasis, and the tela iodoformum oppression group underwent tela iodoformum oppression hemostasis. The outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups in which two kinds of sphenoid sinus packing materials were used for hemostasis after tumor resection by transnasal endoscopic approach. For the catheter balloon compression hemostasis method, on account of the plasticity of the balloon, the volume of water in the balloon can be adjusted according to the size of the patient’s own sphenoid cavity. The amount of bleeding and several complications in terms of discomfort during placement and removal of the packing material, rebleeding after removal of the packing, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and electrolyte disturbance are compared between the two groups. Results: 48 patients were enrolled. The two groups’ data of patients were similar in age structure, sex ratio, tumor size at baseline and so on. No complications, such as abscess formation, were found in both groups. The success rate in the compression with catheter balloon group was 100% (24 of 24 patients); and in the iodoform gauze group 83.33% (20 of 24 patients). A catheter balloon was more successful in stopping bleeding at early stage than iodoform gauze. There were no statistically significant differences in the hospitalization stay time, operating day to discharge day and tampon indwelling time (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in pairwise comparison between the catheter balloon group and iodoform gauze groups in the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea or electrolyte disturbance between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of headache in the catheter balloon group was statistically significantly lower than that in the iodoform gauze group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary tumor resection, compression and hemostasis by means of catheterization expansion lead to lower rates of injury and complications and have a good effect, so this method is worthy of being recommended for clinical practice.

Anesthesia for the endoscopic nasal pituitary tumor resection: a comparison of two anesthetic techniques

Improvement in the Quality of Early Postoperative Course after Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Description of Surgical Technique and Outcome

[Anesthesia Selection in Hypophysectomy by Endoscopic Transnasal Sphenoidal Approach].

Effects on the stress reaction of endoscopic thyroidectomy with two kinds of anesthetic method

Anesthesia of Fuctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Clinical application of reserved gastric tube in neuroendoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumor

Effects of Different Target Plasma Concentrations of Remifentanil on Nasal Mucosal Blood Flow During Endoscopic Nasal Sinus Surgery

Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol-remifentanil on Stress Reaction and Anesthetic Recovery for Patients with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Research on the effect of endoscopic single nostril transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection

Anesthetic recovery outcomes after 2 methods of nasal mucosal preparation for endoscopic sinus surgery

Effects of Various Anesthetic Techniques and PaCO2 Levels on Cerebral Oxygen Balance in Neurosurgical Patients

Anaesthetic Management of Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumor Resection

Effects of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Isoflurane Consumption and Postoperative Pain in Patients Underwent Nasal Endoscopy Surgery

Remifentanil-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery and stress related hormones of serum levels influence

Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenomas Surgery: the Surgical Experience of 178 Consecutive Patients and Learning Curve of Two Neurosurgeons

Effect of target-controlled infusion of remifentanil in combination with propofol on anesthesia and endotracheal intubation response in patients undergoing surgical aneurysm clipping

A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of a New Endoscopic Nasal Mask for Intravenous Anaesthesia with Respiratory Retention: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Improvement and Effect Analysis of a New Neuroendoscopic Trans-Nasal-sphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Resection Approach

Application and Care of Two Kinds of Sphenoid Sinus Packing Materials after Pituitary Tumor Resection with the Transnasal Endoscopic Approach

Effect of Sufentanil or Fentanyl in Combination with Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol on Patients Undergoing Neurosurgical Operation

Endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenomas surgery for 138 consecutive patients