Effect of Pa Clitaxel, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Used for Breast Cancer Chemotherapy on ;cognition Function of Mice

Yao Wanru,Ren Jian,He Jiaqi,Sun Haichen,Liu Shuang,Zhao Yue,Luo Bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2016.01.005
2016-01-01
Abstract:[A bstrca t] Objective To explore the effects of paclitaxel , epirubicin and cyclophosphamide , which are widely used in breast cancer chemotherapy , on the cognition function of mice .Methods Totally 80 Balb/c mice were randomized into four groups , 20 mice in each group .The mice in 3 experimental groups were intraperitoneally injected with paclitaxel ( 30 mg/kg ) , epirubicin ( 10 mg/kg ) , or cyclophosphamide alone (200 mg/kg) respectively.The mice in control group were injected with isovolumic saline .At 4 weeks after injection, all groups were given Morris water maze test , including place navigation and spatial probe test , to record the time the mice spent on underwater platform ( escape latency ) , the ratio of time in every quadrant to total swimming time and the times of crossing the platforma .The escape latencies of mice were compared among groups using repeated measurement analysis of variance , the ratio of time in every quadrant to total swimming time was compared using univariate analysis of variance and the times of crossing the platform among groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test .Results In place navigation test , the escape latencies at 5 time points (on days 1,2,3,4,5 after injection) in four groups were decreased with training time , which showed a trend of decline ( F=11.25 , P=0.001 ) .There was no statistically significant difference in escape latency between paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-treated group and control group , while escape latencies were significantly different at 5 time points ( comparison between groups: F=1.23 , P=0.251;comparison at different time points: F=5.94 , P<0.001; interaction between grouping and different time points:F=0.77 , P=0.676 ) .In spatial probe test , the ratio of time spent in every quadrant to the total swimming time in 4 groups presented a significant difference ( F=3.26 , P=0.027 );it was significantly lower in cyclophosphamide-treated group than that in control group (13.6%±8.9%vs 23.9%±13.9 %;t=-3.05, P=0.009 ) .The difference was not statistically significant between experimental groups and control group in the times of crossing the platform on the sixth day after injection (χ2 =1.86, P=0.602 ).Conclusions Cyclophosphamide can affect the memory maintenance of mice . There is a possibility that chemotherapy medication can affect the ability of spatial cognition and learning in mice .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?