Abstract:Abstract Background: In the international Phase III COmparisoN of Faslodex In Recurrent or Metastatic breast cancer (CONFIRM) study, fulvestrant 500 mg was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) over the 250 mg dose (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68, 0.94; p=0.006) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC) following failure on prior endocrine therapy. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the treatment groups in terms of the incidence or severity of adverse events. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg in a Chinese population for registration purposes. Methods: This was a Phase III randomized, double-blind study in a Chinese population (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01300351). Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) ABC following failure on prior endocrine (antiestrogen [AO] or aromatase inhibitor [AI]) therapy were randomized 1:1 to fulvestrant 500 mg or 250 mg. Patients (pts) were stratified by post-AO/post-AI status and enrollment of post-AI pts was capped at 45%. Primary study endpoint was PFS. Consistency with the global CONFIRM study was to be concluded if the HR for the treatment comparison of PFS was <1 (full analysis set; stratified log-rank test); the study was not powered to detect significant differences between treatment groups. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, ORR, CBR, DoR, DoCB, safety and tolerability. Results: 221 pts were randomized to fulvestrant 500 mg (n=111) or fulvestrant 250 mg (n=110). 121 pts were in the post-AO subgroup and 100 pts were in the post-AI subgroup. Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between fulvestrant 500 mg and fulvestrant 250 mg and comparable with those in the global CONFIRM study. 98% (119/121) in the post-AO subgroup and 92% (92/100) in the post-AI subgroup had adjuvant endocrine therapy, while only 12% (14/121) in the post-AO subgroup and 51% (51/100) in the post-AI subgroup used salvage endocrine therapy. At the time of the primary analysis, 152 progression events (69%) had occurred (post-AO 59% [71/121]; post-AI 81% [81/100]). Median PFS was 8.0 months (m) in the fulvestrant 500 mg group vs 4.0 m in the 250 mg group (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.54, 1.03; p=0.078); the predefined criterion for consistency with the global CONFIRM study was met. In a predefined subgroup analysis of PFS, the HR for fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg was <1 in both post-AO (median PFS 8.1 m vs 5.6 m; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.54, 1.37) and post-AI (median PFS 5.8 m vs 2.9 m; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.42, 1.03) subgroups. Secondary endpoints favored fulvestrant 500 mg over 250 mg, with the exception of median DoR. Safety and tolerability profiles were consistent with the known safety profile of fulvestrant. Conclusions: Data from the present study support the superior clinical benefit of fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg demonstrated in the global CONFIRM study, in postmenopausal Chinese women with ER+ ABC. Hazard ratios favoring fulvestrant 500 mg were observed in both the post-AO and post-AI settings. Citation Format: Zefei Jiang, Qingyuan Zhang, Zhimin Shao, Kunwei Shen, Li Li, Jifeng Feng, Zhongseng Tong, Kangsheng Gu, Xiaojia Wang, Binghe Xu, Guofang Sun, Huifang Chen, Yuri Rukazenkov. A phase III study of fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg in postmenopausal Chinese women with advanced breast cancer and disease progression following failure on prior antiestrogen or aromatase inhibitor therapy: Supporting superior clinical benefit for the [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-07.

Efficacy and safety of 500 mg fulvestrant treatment for postmenopausal patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer

A comparison of fulvestrant plus a targeted agent with fulvestrant alone in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapy: a meta-analysis

Efficacy of Fulvestrant 500 Mg in Chinese Postmenopausal Women with Advanced/recurrent Breast Cancer and Factors Associated with Prolonged Time-to-treatment Failure

Efficacy and Safety of Fulvestrant 500 Mg in Chinese HR-positive, HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Real-World Study.

Efficacy and Safety of Fulvestrant 500mg in Hormone-receptor Positive Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Real-world Study in China.

A retrospective study of 500 mg fulvestrant in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer patients pretreat-ed with the third generation of aromatase inhibitors

Abstract P5-11-20: Efficacy Observation of 306 Patients with Fulvestrant 500mg Treatment in Hormone-Receptor Positive HER2 Negative Metastasis Breast Cancer, a Real World Study

Fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind registrational trial in China

Tolerability and effectiveness of fulvestrant as first-line endocrine therapy in unselected patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results of a multicenter, single arm, non-interventional study.

A Phase II Study of Fulvestrant 500 mg as Maintenance Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy

Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Abstract P1-13-07: A Phase III Study of Fulvestrant 500 Mg Versus 250 Mg in Postmenopausal Chinese Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Disease Progression Following Failure on Prior Antiestrogen or Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Supporting Superior Clinical Benefit for The

Fulvestrant in the treatment of luminal metastatic breast cancer: the balance of effectiveness and safety

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Everolimus and Fulvestrant in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressed after Endocrine Therapy

Fulvestrant 500 Mg Versus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Adjuvant Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Retrospective Evaluation of Fulvestrant Efficacy and Clinical Results in Patients Using Fulvestrant

Fulvestrant As Maintenance Therapy after First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer (FANCY), a Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm Phase 2 Study.

THE EFFICACY OF FIRST LINE FULVESTRANT IN HORMONE-RECEPTOR POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER

Fulvestrant as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients (FANCY): A prospective, multicenter, single arm phase II study.

Optimal duration of prior endocrine therapy predicts the efficacy of Fulvestrant in a real‐world study for patients with hormone receptor‐positive and HER2‐negative advanced breast cancer

The Outcome of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer with Lung Metastasis Treated with Fulvestrant is Superior to That of Those with Liver Metastasis.