A Comparative Study of Clinical Features and Prognosis Between Type-2 Diabetic Patients with Diffusive Sclerosis and with Nodular Nephropathy

DU Hong,TANG Zheng,CHEN Huiping,LIU Zhihong,LI Leishi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-298x.2005.01.009
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective:In Type 2 diabetic patients, two types of diabetic nephropathy were described pathologically, one with diffusive glomerulosclerosis(DIF), and the other with nodular glomerulosclerosis (NOD). In this study, we retrospectively investigated and compared the clinical features and prognosis between this two subgroups of diabetic nephropathy. Methodology:This study included 124 patients who underwent a evaluation renal biopsy, and 58 were classified in DIF group, and 66 in NOD group. Data as the duration of diabetes and hypertension, body mass index(BMI), diabetic retinopathy, plasma glycosylated hemoglobin, albumin, proteinuria, NAG enzyme, urine osmolity, creatinine clearance rate(Ccr) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. 5 year renal survival rates and patient survival were calculated and compared in those who were followed up for more than 1 year. Results:①Compared to patients in the DIF group, patients in NOD group had longer duration of diabetic mellitus [(119±8 5) vs (52±8 9) m, P 0.01], heavier proteinuria [(4 20±3.3) vs (1 79±2 0) g/24h, P 0 01], lower Ccr [(46 1+ 25 0) vs (68 4+ 28 2) ml/min];②In the NOD group, 90% of patients complicated with diabetic retinopathy, while in the DIF group, only 14% presented with diabetic retinopathy.③In the NOD group, the 5 year renal and patient survival rate were 31% and 48% respectively, while in the DIF group, the 5 year renal and patient survival rate were 80% and 84% respectively ( P 0 01). Conclusion:Diabetic patients with nodular glomerulopathy had longer diabetic duration, more severe renal damage, and poorer prognosis, as compared to those with diffusive glomerulosclerosis. Higher risk to develop diabetic retinopathy was found in diabetic patients with nodular glomerulopathy. We suggested that compared with NOD, DIF maybe the pathological type of an earlier stage in DN.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?