The Comparison of Effect between the Laparoscopic Sigmoid Colon Graft and Buccal Mucosa Graft in Vaginoplasty for Patients with MRKH Syndrome

Jun-jie HOU,Yong-guang MA,Jie ZHANG,Xin YANG,Jiong YUAN,Jian-ning LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.001929
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect between laparoscopic sigmoid colon graft and buccal mucosa graft in vaginoplasty for patients with MRKH syndrome. Methods From April 2008 to June 2012, there were altogether 21 patients with MRKH syndrome, receiving vaginoplasty in department of plastic surgery of peking university third hospital. Twenty-one patients with MRKH syndrome have received treatments and are divided into two groups, with one group receiving laparoscopically assisted vascularized sigmoid colon graft and the other group receiving buccal micro-mucosa graft for vaginoplasty. Analyze and compare the time span of these two surgery methods, the bleeding volume in surgery, the degree of narrowing and shortening of the vagina after surgery, the state of mucous membranes and the evaluation of moist degree of the reconstructed vagina. Results There are eleven patients receiving laparoscopically assisted vascularized sigmoid colon graft. After 18 months of follow-up, there was no stenosis in the external orifice of the vagina, no shortening, complete and bright internal mucosal wall, and little scar on the abdominal wall of the 4 puncture holes. Ten cases were treated with oral mucosal microparticle grafting. After 3 months of follow-up, no vaginal reconstruction within 30% micro mucosa covered by dressing after most of the region in 6 months after operation through the mucous membrane around the crawling coverage, 18 months after surgery, 8 patients had vaginal reconstruction shortened 3-5cm. The laparoscopically assisted vascularize sigmoid colon graft for vaginoplasty takes more time than the buccal micro-mucosa graft does (160±18min VS 90±15min, P<0.01). The bleeding state in the laparoscopically assisted vascularize sigmoid colon graft surgery is heavier than that in buccal micro-mucosa graft surgery(100±20ml VS 50±8ml, P<0.01). The degree of narrowing and shortening of the vagina reconstructed by buccal micro-mucosa graft is more serious than that reconstructed by laparoscopically assisted vascularize sigmoid colon graft ( 4±1.1cmVS 2±0.4cm,P<0.05). The evaluation of moist degree of the vagina reconstructed by laparoscopically assisted vascularize sigmoid colon graft is better than that reconstructed by buccal micro-mucosa graft (7.6±0.6points VS 5.5±0.8points, P<0.05). Conclusion Compare to buccal micro-mucosa graft, the laparoscopically assisted vascularized sigmoid colon graft is a relatively ideal surgery method for a better reconstructed vaginal function effect in vaginoplasty.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?