Predictors of pathological upstaging after transurethral resection of bladder tumor

Genyi QU,Yupeng WU,Ning XU,Shaohao CHEN,Yunzhi LIN,Jinbei HUANG,Yong WEI,Qingshui ZHENG,Xueyi XUE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.10.007
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To determine the accuracy of clinical stage after transurethral resection of bladder tumor and to identify factors predicting the discrepancy between clinical stage and pathological stage.Method:We retrospectively reviewed 258 patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor from January 2010 to January 2014.Clinicopathological characteristics were collected to compare the difference between clinical stage and pathological stage.Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of pathological upstaging.Result:The concordance rate was 86.8% (224/258) between clinical stage and pathological stage.Stage was upgraded in 29 patients and was downgraded in 5 patients.Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the presence of a palpable mass in the bimanual examination was a predictor of pathological upstaging (P<0.01,OR =11.43,95 % CI:2.25-58.21).Conclusion:This study demonstrated the high accuracy between clinical and pathological stage.A palpable mass in the bimanual examination was an independent predictor of pathological upstaging.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?