Long-term outcomes of brachytherapy for high-grade prostate cancer

Fan ZHANG,Chunlei XIAO,Yi HUANG,Lulin MA,Junjie WANG,Weiqiang RAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.12.008
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the long-term clinical value and safety of I125 particle implantation brachytherapy in treating high-grade non-metastatic prostate cancer.Method:We retrospectively analyzed 67 cases with Gleason score≥8 biopsy-proven non-metastatic prostate cancer from 2007 to 2017.The average age was (74.2 ±4.8) years old,and pre-biopsy PSA was (27.6±22.8) ng/ml.There were 35 cases (52.2%) of biopsy GS 8 and 32 cases (47.8%) of biopsy GS higher than 8.There were 42 patients (62.7%) with clinical stage T2 and 25 patients (37.3 %) with clinical stage T3.All patients were performed I125 particle implantation brachytherapy as initial treatment,adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was used ranging from 6 to 12 months after the brachytherapy.Biochemical recurrence was defined as a PSA level of 2 ng/ml more than the nadir.Biochemical recurrence free survival,cancer specific survival and overall survival were calculated by the data of follow-up.Result:All highgrade patients were performed brachytherapy successfully.Over an average follow-up period of 56.1 months,49.3% (33/67) patients had a biochemical recurrence,the average biochemical progression time was 28.8 months.Thirteen cases (19.4%) were death during the follow-up period,and seven of them (10.1%) died of prostate cancer progression.The biochemical recurrence free survival rate,cancer specific survival rate and overall survival rate were 59.7%,94.9% and 89.8% in three years,42.6%,91.5% and 83.1 % in five years respectively in high-grade prostate cancer patients.The biochemical recurrence free survival for men beween Gleason score 8 and Gleason score higher than 8 showed significant difference ((P<0.05)) according to Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis.Conclusion:I125 particle implantation brachytherapy is an effective and safe method for clinical nonmetastatic high-grade prostate cancer.However,we should pay attention to prostate cancer patients with Gleason score higher than 8 for its rapid disease progression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?