Supraorbital Approach and Trans-Supraorbital Approach in Sellar Microsurgery: a Comparison Study

王镛斐,李士其,吴劲松,赵耀,寿雪飞

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-122x.2005.10.002

2005-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare clinical applications of supraorbital approach and supraorbital keyhole approach in sellar microsurgery. Methods Operative experiences of 25 cases were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 9 were pituitary adenomas, 6 craniopharyngiomas, 3 tuberculum sellae meningiomas, 4 arachnoidal cysts, 2 Rathke's cysts, and 1 was epithelioid cyst. 17 cases were treated via supraorbital approach, while 8 via supraorbital keyhole approach. Neuroendoscopy was used during the operation in part of the patients. Results MRI showed of 17 cases via supraorbital approach, total removal the tumor was achieved in 13 cases, subtotal in 3, and partial in 1; of 8 cases via supraorbital keyhole approach, total and subtotal removals were achieved in 4 cases respectively. Supraorbital keyhole approach combining keyhole technique and skull-base surgical technique not only made the stretching of frontal lobe be decreased to the lowest extent, but also increased 20 degrees of the visual angle to expose the sellar region and shortened the route to the target. Conclusions Supraorbital approach is simple, convenient, suitable for most sellar tumors, especially for cystic lesions, whereas supraorbital keyhole approach is suitable of the resection of larger tumors in the sellar region. Neuroendoscopy as assisted technique is useful for confirming the operative effect and reducing the chance of residual tumors intra-operatively.