Abstract:Background: Recent randomized trials (RCTs) in the field of robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) showed no significant differences in perioperative outcomes between the off- and on-clamp approaches. Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of on- versus off-clamp pure laparoscopic PN (LPN). Design setting and participants: A multi-institutional analysis of the on- versus off-clamp approach during LPN in the setting of an RCT (CLOCK II trial; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02287987) was performed. Intervention: Off- versus on-clamp LPN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Baseline patient and tumor variables, and peri- and postoperative data were collected. Randomized allocation with a 1:1 ratio was assigned. Surgical strategy for managing the renal pedicle was dictated by the study protocol. In the off-clamp arm, the renal artery had to remain unclamped for the duration of the whole procedure. Reporting the intention-to-treat analysis is the purpose of the study. Results and limitations: The study recruited 249 patients. Of them, 123 and 126 were randomized and allocated into the on- and off-clamp treatment groups, respectively. Treatment groups were comparable at baseline after randomization with respect to patients' demographics, comorbidities, renal function, and tumor size and complexity. A univariable analysis found no differences in the perioperative outcomes between the groups, including median (interquartile range) estimated blood loss (150 [100-200] vs 150 [100-250] ml, p = 0.2), grade ≥2 complication rate as classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system (5.7% vs 4.8%, p = 0.6), and positive surgical margin rate (8.2% vs 3.5% for the on- vs off-clamp group, p = 0.1). No differences were found in terms of the 1st (81.3 [66.7-94.3] vs 85.3 [71.0-97.7] ml/min, p = 0.2) and 5th postoperative days estimated glomerular filtration rate (83.3 [70.5-93.7] vs 83.4 [68.6-139.3] ml/min, p = 0.2). A multivariable analysis found each +1 increase in RENAL score corresponded to an increase in the protection from the occurrence of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.97, p = 0.034), while each +1 cm increase in tumor size corresponded to an increase in the risk of blood transfusion (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.70, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In the setting of an RCT, no differences were found in the perioperative and early functional outcomes between on- and off-clamp LPN. Patient summary: In this study, we investigated, by means of a randomized trial, whether avoiding the clamping of renal artery during laparoscopic resection of renal mass is able to translate into benefits. We found no differences in terms of safety, efficacy, and renal function from the standard approach, which includes arterial clamping.

Analysis of risk factors affecting the application of off‐clamp procedure during laparoscopic partial ne‐phrectomy

A Retrospective Analysis of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Segmental Renal Artery Clamping and Factors That Predict Postoperative Renal Function

Establishment of the Risk Assessment Model of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Segmental Renal Artery Clamping for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Nephrometry Score-Guided Off-Clamp Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Patient Selection and Short-Time Functional Results

Factors influencing the feasibility of segmental artery clamping during retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Risk Factors of Open Surgery Conversion in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy to Achieve Nephron Sparing

Comparison of different surgical treatment of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma

The application of off-clamping in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal tumors

Impact of No-Clamping Partial Nephrectomy on Early Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Preservation

Comparison of Perioperative, Renal Functional, and Oncological Outcomes Between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: An Updated Evidence-Based Analysis

Comparing Perioperative Complications of Off-Clamp versus On-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cancer Using a Novel Energy Balancing Weights Method

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing On-clamp Versus Off-clamp Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses (CLOCK II Laparoscopic Study): A Intention-to-treat Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Scored Match Analysis

Renal Functional and Perioperative Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Segmental Renal Artery Clamping.

Fewer Complications after Laparoscopic Nephrectomy As Compared to the Open Procedure with the Modified Clavien Classification System - a Retrospective Analysis from Southern China

Conventional Laparoscopy and Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Technique for Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Indications and Clinical Outcomes

[Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Cell Carcinoma].

Analysis of different surgical treatments of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma

A Novel Nephrometry Scoring System for Predicting Peri-Operative Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Oncologic Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Treating Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study