Endovascular treatment of occluded and stenotic superior mesenteric artery in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia

Xiao Tang,Daqiao Guo,Bin Chen,Zhenyu Shi,Junhao Jiang,Xin Xu,Jue Yang,Lixin Wang,Hanfei Tang,Changpo Lin,Dong Yan,Weiguo Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760.cma.j.issn.2096-1863.2016.03.008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and outcomes of endovascular recanalization of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).Methods A singleinstitution retrospective review was performed to include 30 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for CMI between 2003 and 2016.Procedural and follow-up data were collected for assessment of technical success,perioperative complications,and target vessel failure.Results Technical success was achieved in 27 of 30 patients (90%) with stent-assisted angioplasty using bare metal stents,including 21 balloon expandable stents and 7 self-expanding stents.In 14 patients procedures were done via a femoral approach,while in 16 patients a brachial access was used.There was no statistically significant difference between the two vascular accesses in the success rate of SMA revascularization.One case had femoral pseudoaneurysm,but there were no major perioperative complications or death in our cohort.All patients who underwent successful recanalization reported symptomatic improvement.Follow-up was available in 25 of 30 patients (83.3%) at a mean follow-up of 18 months (12-42 months) after the procedure.At one year after the intervention,the rate of in-stent restenosis was 13.0% (3/23) in the SMA lesion.Conclusions The present data show that endovascular SMA treatment is a safe procedure in patients suffering from CMI with satisfactory short-term results.In an effort to improve the success rate of recanalization and long-term patency,suitable candidate selection,multiple endovascular skills and close follow-up should be utilized.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?