Comparative study on curative effect of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy

Zhongfei ZHU,Bin SONG,Hongyun MA,Liu OUYANG,Gang LI,Tianlin HE,Yijie ZHANG,Gang JIN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16139/j.1007-9610.2015.05.011
2015-01-01
Abstract:[Abstrcact] Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) with those of open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for the tumors of body and tail of the pancreas. Methods Ninty-two patients with the benign or borderline tumors of pancreas were analyzed retrospectively from October 2012 to December 2013 including 42 patients of LDP with 10 spleen-preserving and 50 patients of ODP with 3 spleen-preserving. Patient characteristics, blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and overall costs were compared between 2 groups. Results The demographic data were similar between LDP and ODP except for body mass index, which was higher in LDP group than in ODP group (24.79 vs 23.18, P=0.001). There was a significant difference of operative time between LDP and ODP (153.19 min vs 119.19 min, P<0.001). The patients in LDP group had less blood loss, postoper-ative time to restarting diet, shorter length of postoperative stay than the patients in ODP group ( P<0.05), while postop-erative complications between 2 groups were similar in terms of pancreatic fistula (33.3% vs 36.0%, P>0.05). The over-all costs in LDP group were more than in ODP group with no statistical significance (4.49 ×104 RMB vs 4.29×104 RMB, P>0.05). Conclusions LDP has the advantages of safety and feasibility for benign or borderline tumors of body and tail of the pancreas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?