A comparison of MRI, three-dimensional ultrasound and arthroscopy in evaluating rotator cuff tears

江长青,宫琳,张文涛,肖德明,李伟,翁鉴,陈国飞
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2015.01.007
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the superiority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in diagnosing rotator cuff tears (RCT) by comparing with the shoulder arthroscopy. Methods From August 2012 to January 2014, 46 patients with RCT used MRI and 3D ultrasound exam before operation, compared all result with each presentation of shoulder arthroscopy, in order to evaluate the accuracy of MRI and 3D ultrasound in diagnosing RCT. Results Among 46 patients, the diagnosis was 40 with full thickness RCT and 6 with partial thickness RCT by MRI; 37 patients with full thickness RCT and 9 patients with partial thickness RCT by 3D ultrasound; 39 patients with full thickness RCT and 7 patients with partial thickness RCT by shoulder arthroscopy. The sensibility, specificity and accuracy of MRI in diagnosing full thickness RCT was 97.4%, 71.4% and 93.4%;the sensibility, specificity and accuracy of 3D ultrasound was 92.3%, 85.7% and 91.3%. There was no significant difference between MRI and 3D ultrasound in diagnosing full thicknes RCT (P<0.05), but the specificity of MRI in diagnosing partial thickness RCT was better than 3D ultrasound (P <0.05). Conclusion Both 3D ultrasound and MRI has relatively high accuracy and specificity in diagnosing full thickness RCT, but MRI is better than 3D ultrasound in diagnosing partial thickness RCT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?