Indication of salvage liver transplantation

史瑞,张海明,宋卓伦,饶伟,郑卫萍,郑虹,邓永林,沈中阳

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.03.004

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the indications of salvage liver transplantation (liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection).Method 172 cases of salvage liver transplant patients from June 2000 to March 2013 were analyzed retrospectively.Fortyseven cases of them met the Milan criteria,62 cases met the University of California San Francisco criteria (UCSF),70 cases met the up to sever criteria,61 cases met the Fudan criteria,and 139 cases met the Hangzhou criteria.Correlation for five kinds of standards and prognosis were analyzed by kaplan-meier survival analysis.Result Total patients 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rate of salvage liver transplant got 82％,56.4％,and 51.6％,respectively.1-,3-,and 5-year survival rate of salvage liver transplant patients meeting the Milan criteria was 89％,75.1％,and 70.1％ respectively,and that not meeting the Milan criteria was 79.6％,52.5％,and 45.1％ respectively.1-,3-,and 5-year survival rate of liver transplant patients meeting the Hangzhou criteria was 86.1％,66.8％ and 58.7％ respectively,and that not meeting the Hangzhou criteria was 64.1％,19.7％,and 19.7％ respectively.1-,3-and 5-year survival rate in 92 cases meeting the Hangzhou criteria but not in line with the Milan criteria was 84.7％,63％ and 53.9％ respectively,and had no statistically significant difference from the similar recipients in line with Milan criteria (P =0.122).Conclusion Using the existing criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation for salvage liver transplantation is feasible.A better indication of salvage liver transplantation should be found in a wider range of studies and a larger sample size.