Abstract:Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement via right minithoracotomy .Methods Databases including PubMed,EMbase,The Cochrane Library (Issue 2,2014),CBM,CNKI,WanFang Data and VIP were searched electronically from their inception to June 2014.Two reviewers identified the literature independently according to inclusion and exclusion criteria .After data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies ,Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of seven studies involving 1372 cases were included.The results of Meta-analysis showed that:compared with traditional group,minimally invasive group prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time [SMD =0.41, 95% CI(0.16,0.66),P =0.001],and aortic clamping time [SMD =0.49,95% CI(0.13,0.84),P =0.007], but the postoperative hospital stay [SMD =-0.84,95% CI( -1.25, -0.43),P <0.000 01],postoperative ICU stay [SMD =-0.54,95% CI( -0.90, -0.17),P =0.004]and postoperative drainage [SMD =-1.89,95% CI ( -3.21, -0.58),P =0.005] in minimally invasive group were significantly less than that in the traditional group,the difference was statistically significant .There was no statistical significance in postoperative mechanical ventilation time [SMD =-0.64,95% CI( -1.32,0.04),P =0.06]and perioperative mortality[OR =0.56,95%CI(0.18,1.77),P =0.33].Conclusion Minimally invasive mitral valve replacement via right minithoracotomy has the disadvantages of minor trauma ,quicker recovery,safe and effective and is worthy of promotion.Due to the quantity and quality of the included studies ,the above conclusion still needs to be verified by carrying out more high-quality prospective trial designs.

Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement via right minithoracotomy and traditional mitral valve replacement:a Meta-analysis