Abstract:Objective: To investigate the relationship between the previous cesarean scar thickness, previous cesarean scar defect and the occurrence of uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section and to predict the occurrence of uterine rupture in the third trimester for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section by analyzing the lower uterine segment (LUS) situation or quantitatively measure LUS myometrium thickness. Methods: A total of 154 pregnant women who have a prior cesarean from January 2015 to March 2016 were selected, all of them regularly did the prenatal examination in the pregnancy period and finally gave birth in hospital. By the transvaginal sonograph, the LUS myometrium thickness (transverse and longitudinal thickness) and the size of the previous cesarean scar defect were measured in the first trimester, the LUS myometrium thickness (longitudinal thickness) and qualitatively analysis LUS condition were measured in the third trimester. They were divided into two groups according to the pregnancy outcome: uterine rupture group (found in the cesarean operation or during the pregnancy) and without uterine rupture group (including the vaginal delivery women and those without uterine rupture in the cesarean operation period). The sensitivity and specificity of LUS myometrium thickness in the first trimester and the qualitative analysis LUS situation, the quantitative measurement of LUS myometrium thickness in the third trimester were compared in the prediction of occurrence of uterine rupture (dehiscence or complete rupture). Results: The group without uterine rupture included 134 women (6 vaginal delivery and 128 cesarean delivery), and the group with uterine rupture included 20 women (all of them cesarean delivery). The LUS myometrium thickness in the third trimester in the group without uterine rupture was (1.6±0.5) mm, and was (1.1±0.7) mm in the uterine rupture group (P= 0.004). There were no significant difference between two groups in the mean value of age, height, weight, the interdelivery interval, the LUS myometrium thickness (transverse and longitudinal thickness) in the first trimester. Qualitative analysis of LUS condition had higher specificity (99%), higher positive predictive value (92%), higher negative predictive value (94%) and slightly lower sensitivity (60%) than quantitative measure of LUS myometrium thickness in predicting uterine rupture. Conclusions: Measurement of the LUS myometrium thickness in the first trimester is helpful for predicting the occurrence of uterine rupture, so it is not necessary to terminate the pregnancy because of the thin LUS or the little prior cesarean scar defect in the first trimester. However it should be paid close attention to the LUS situation during the whole gestation. Qualitatively analyzing LUS situation is more meaningful than quantitatively measuring LUS myometrium thickness in predicting the uterine rupture in the third trimester.

Clinical analysis on related risk factors of uterine rupture of the scarred uterus

Analysis of high risk factors for complications in the trial of vaginal delivery due to uterine scarring in a subsequent pregnancy to a cesarean section.

Clinical analysis of 12 cases of uterine rupture during pregnancy

Epidemiology of uterine rupture among pregnant women in China and development of a risk prediction model: analysis of data from a multicentre, cross-sectional study

[Clinical Study on 67 Cases with Uterine Rupture].

[Correlation Between Uterine Scar Condition and Uterine Rupture for Pregnancy Women after Previous Cesarean Section].

Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery

Postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean delivery in women with a scarred uterus: A retrospective cohort study

Clinical analysis of 70 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy

Complete rupture of the pregnant uterus: A 12‐year retrospective study

Clinical Features, Management and Maternal-Infant Prognosis in Patients with Complete Uterine Rupture in the Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy.

Clinical Study on the Relationship Between Lower Uterine Segment Scar Thickness and Choices of Delivery Pattern of Women with Scarred Uterus Pregnancy

Pregnancy Outcomes and Associated Factors for Uterine Rupture: an 8 Years Population-Based Retrospective Study.

Biomechanical Modeling of Cesarean Section Scars and Scar Defects

Effect of vaginal delivery and cesarean section on twin pregnancy outcomes and pregnancy associated risk factors

LOWER UTERINE SEGMENT THICKNESS MEASUREMENT AND UTERINE SCAR INTEGRITY IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH PRIOR CESAREAN SECTION USING TWO-DIMENSIONAL TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND: A PROSPECTIVECONTROLLED STUDY IN SHARM INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL

Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy

[Clinical Risk Factors of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies].

Clinical Characteristics of Complete Uterine Rupture

Timing and assessment of the risk of uterine scar pregnancy

[Evaluation of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Induced in the Second Trimester: a National Multicenter Retrospective Study].