Host tissue reaction in situ to three synthetic anti-incontinence slings in a rabbit model

Mou DENG,Xin LUO,Jing DING,Tao XU,Yu-yu YUAN,Guo-shuai WANG,Man LIU,Kui-lin LAI,Lan ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2015.08.08
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the host tissue reaction and safety in a rabbit model after in situ implantation of three different synthetic anti-incontinence slings.MethodS A total of 45 clean female New Zealand rabbits were randomized into three groups with 15 in each group, group A used three -dimensional electrospinning Polyvinylidene fluoride ( PVDF ) sling, ( group B used polypropylene ( PP) sling, and group C used traditional technique PVDF sling.In each group, a piece of implant was placed into the space between urethra and vagina of the rabbits.Animals were sacrificed at week 4, 12, 26 after implantation for gross observation and histopathologic study.Results Postoperative abnormal urination, sling erosion or retraction were not observed in 3 groups.No obvious difference was observed in 3 groups under gross observation before and after implantation.Minimal fibrosis as well as mild inflammatory reaction and rich angiogenesis were observed in group A.In goup B and C, thicker fibers encompassed the implants and penetrated into the surrounding tissue under a long term observation.However, the histopathologic grading showed no significant difference in week 4, week 12 or week 26 among three groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The 3 different slings were all safe in rabbits’ body tissue with good biocompatibility.Three-dimensional electrospinning PVDF sling may be a promising synthetic sling for the treatment of female SUI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?