Effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone insert for labor induction in women with different cervical maturity
Xueyuan LI,Li LAO,Yinghui ZHANG,Yuewen GUO,Ping JIN,Baomin YIN,Xiaoyi WANG,Dunjin CHEN,Xiaobin LIN,Xiang CHEN,Qinglan LIN,Yanping YU,Yanwen XU,Bin ZHU,Yiwei QIN,Hui CHEN,Jianping ZHANG,Shengli AN,Zhijian WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2017060118
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone insert for labor induction in women with different cervical maturity.Methods A total of 798 women in 10 hospitals who used dinoprostone insert for induction at term from January 2010 to December 2014 in the Pearl River Delta of Guangdong province were selected as research subjects (study group).Another 496 pregnant women who were inducted by oxytocin were included as control group.After stratification by Bishop score and primipara,the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone insert for induction at term were analyzed retrospectively.Results For multipara with a Bishop score of 4~6,the vaginal delivery rate within 24h was higher in the study group (81.82% vs.66.04%,P=0.013).For primipara with a Bishop score of 4~6,the rate of uterine tachysystole was higher in the study group (4.65%vs.0.99%,P=0.009).Other adverse reactions were similar in the two groups.No significant differences were found in the rate of Apgar score ≤7 at 1-min and 5-min of the neonates between the two groups.Conclusion The effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone insert for induction at term is similar to that of oxytocin.Dinoprostone insert is worthy of being widely applied in clinic.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?