Clinical evaluation of prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion in patients with cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa and placenta accreta
Rong HU,Wei WU,Jiang-nan WU,Xiao-tian LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2018080118
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion in cases of cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa and placenta accreta.Methods A total of 63 cases who had delivery in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from 1 January 2015 to 31 June 2017 were enrolled, who had cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa and placenta accreta.Based on the date of prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion on 1 November 2016, cases were divided into two groups:after (group A, 17 cases) and before (group B, 46 cases), and we compared pregnancy and perinatal outcome, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, hemoglobin level, operation mode, hysterectomy rate, hospitalization time, time of antibiotic use, and neonatal Apgar score and ward admission rate.Results (1) There was no significant difference in age, gravidity, parity, length of pregnancy, prior cesarean deliveries or complications of pregnancy between the two groups (P＞0.05). (2) Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, change in hemoglobin and bladder injury rate did not differ between the two groups (P＞0.05).The patients receiving other suture methods (respectively41.2％, 17.4％), intrauterine packing with gauze or Bakey balloon (respectively 47.1％, 19.6％), postoperative uterine artery embolization (respectively 52.9％, 23.9％) were more in group A (P＜0.05).The rates of DIC (respectively 5.9％, 34.8％) and hysterectomy (respectively 17.6％, 47.8％) were lower in group A (P＜0.05). (3) There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative antibiotic use time or postoperative morbidity between the two groups (P＞0.05). (4) There was no significant difference in neonatal birth weight, oneminute and five-minute low Apgar score, or neonatal hospitalization rate between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The prophylactic abdominal aorta balloon occlusion can reduce DIC and hysterectomy risk in patients with pernicious placenta previa and placenta accreta during cesarean section, while the risk of bleeding still exists after balloon removal, so other hemostatic methods are needed.