Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical and physiological effects of high frequency oscillation compared with conventional ventilation in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases to March 2010, conference proceedings, bibliographies, and primary investigators.STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials of high frequency oscillation compared with conventional ventilation in adults or children with acute lung injury/ARDS. Data selection Three authors independently extracted data on clinical, physiological, and safety outcomes according to a predefined protocol. We contacted investigators of all included studies to clarify methods and obtain additional data. Analyses used random effects models.RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials (n=419 patients) were included; almost all patients had ARDS. Methodological quality was good. The ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen at 24, 48, and 72 hours was 16-24% higher in patients receiving high frequency oscillation. There were no significant differences in oxygenation index because mean airway pressure rose by 22-33% in patients receiving high frequency oscillation (P</=0.01). In patients randomised to high frequency oscillation, mortality was significantly reduced (risk ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98, P=0.03; six trials, 365 patients, 160 deaths), and treatment failure (refractory hypoxaemia, hypercapnoea, hypotension, or barotrauma) resulting in discontinuation of assigned therapy was less likely (0.67, 0.46 to 0.99, P=0.04; five trials, 337 patients, 73 events). Other risks were similar. There was substantial heterogeneity between trials for physiological (I(2)=21-95%) but not clinical (I(2)=0%) outcomes. Pooled results were based on few events for most clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION: High frequency oscillation might improve survival and is unlikely to cause harm. As ongoing large multicentre trials will not be completed for several years, these data help clinicians who currently use or are considering this technique for patients with ARDS.

Current Status and Recognition of High Frequency Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Application Progress of Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical application of high frequency oscillatory ventilation in ARDS

Application of Noninvasive Ventilation in Children with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The Effect of High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation on Adults with ARDS

Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome?

High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Meta-Analysis

Observations on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation effects in pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome after congenital heart surgery

The progress of mechanical ventilation strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:The Past, Current Status and Prospect

High frequency oscillation in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:Prone Position Ventilation Treatment Status and Renew

[Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome].

Clinical advances in selection of mean airway pressure of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation

The Effect of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation or Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Children with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome As a Rescue Therapy.

The Clinical Application of High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Children

Clinical observation on effects of high frequency oscillating ventilation on patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome

Mechanical Ventilation Management and Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Practice in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Cross‐sectional Survey of Intensive Care Unit Clinicians in Mainland China

Is High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation More Effective and Safer Than Conventional Protective Ventilation in Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

To Treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:I Prefer High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy

Analysis of invasive mechanical ventilation protocol in acute respiratory distress syndrome