The Effect of Nerve Growth Factor Injection in Cerebral Ventricle on the Behavior Change of Hydrocephalus Young Rats

SHI Wei,LI Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2011.09.013
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the effect of nerve growth factor injection in cerebral ventricle on the behavior change of hydrocephalus young rats. Methods Thirty 1-month-old male Wistar rats,all treated by injection of white clay into cistema magna to develop the models of communicating hydrocephalus, were verified 1 month later by MRI. After the models gained, the rats were randomly divided into three groups, the experimental group was injected NGF 0. 3 ml (1000U, for 3 days consecutively) in cerebral ventricle, the placebo group was injected 0. 3 ml physiological saline (for 3 days consecutively) in cerebral ventricle, the control group was received no treatment. Two weeks later,the three groups of rats' behavior were studied respectively by Morris water maze and open-field analysis, then the rats were sacrificed after experiment. And the structural changes in hippocampus of rats and the expressions of S-100β and GFAP were shown by HE staining and immunohistochemistry. Results The rats in placebo group and control group had longer swimming time (108. 1 ± 31.2 vs 110. 2± 28. 7), and more errors in water maze (4. 8 ± 1.4 vs 4. 7 ± 1.5), but lower the capability in spatial cognition and adaptability to new environment (82. 1 ± 21.3 vs 3.3 ± 1.3). The positive expression fo GFAP in hippocampus of rats in experimental group(122. 53 ± 13. 50) was significant lower than that in the placebo group(224. 68 ± 8. 65) and control group(256. 80 ± 10. 22). The S-1003-positive cells in hippocarnpus of rats in experiment group were also siginifcant lower than those of the placebo group and control group. Conclusions The learning and memorizing ability, spatial cognition ability and activity in placebo group and control group of young rats are lower than those in experimental group,showing that the injection of nerve growth factor in cerebral ventricle has protective function to the hydrocephalus cerebellum damage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?