Preliminary observations on clinical efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy

Xin-xin SHAO,Chun-guang GUO,Fu-hai MA,Yang LI,Li-zhuang FAN,Hou-hong ZHOU,Yan-tao TIAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2016.14.11.01
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and short-term effects of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscop-ic-assisted radical gastrectomy (LARG). Method 87 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma with elective LARG were included in the study, in which 38 patients who underwent LARG using a high-definition 3D laparoscope and 49 patients who un-derwent LARG using a two-dimensional (2D) laparoscope were stratified as 3D LARG group and 2D LARG group, re-spectively, and the two groups were compared with respect to surgical approach, operative time, blood loss, post-opera-tive complications, pathologic data, post-operative intestinal flatus, and hospital stay. Result There was no significant difference observed between the surgical approach, tumor size, tumor location, number of resected lymph nodes, and TNM stage of the two groups (P>0.05);While the 3D LARG group had less average operative time and fewer blood loss, as well as shorter time to postoperative intestinal flatus and hospital stay than 2D LARG group (P>0.05);None of these patients had salvage laparotomy;All patients were followed for a median time of 7 months, and no deaths, no tumor recur-rences, or metastases were recorded. Conclusion 3D LARG is safe and feasible, facilitating the operators with precise and stereoscopic vision, which is clinically applicable;However, further large-sample studies, preferably prospective ran-domized control trials, are required to confirm the clinical effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?