Value of serum p53 autoantibodies in the detection and prognosis estimation of glioma patients

Ke ZHOU,Yu-lun HUANG,Xue-wen ZHANG,Xiao-xiao HAN,Hui YAO,Hai-bing ZHANG,You-xin ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2017.17.007
2017-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE This research explored the diagnostic value of detecting p53 autoantibodies in glioma patients' serum and its correlation with future prognosis.METHODS In the tumor tissue and serum samples of 48 glioma patients,and 38 controls of this study,peptide microarray technology was used to detect the presence of p53 autoantibodies in response to the polypeptides,polymerase chain reaction(PCR) was used to detect the expression of p53 mRNA in organization,immunohistochemistry(IHC) was used to detect the expression of p53 protein in sample.RESULTS The signal noise ratio(SNR) of 48 serum samples was 19.05±22.21,which was significantly higher than the SNR of normal controls(7.08-[-5.75).The cut-off value for diagnosis by p53 autoantibody was 18.58.The area under the curve of ROC was 0.63.Totally 18 of the 48 glioma patients were autoantibody positive,which represent 37.5% of the cases.Meanwhile,only one(2.6%) of the 38 controls was autoantibody positive.The sensitivity of glioma diagnosis by p53 autoantibody was 37.50%,while the specificity was 97.36%.Grades of glioma do not appear to be correlated with p53 autoantibody status.No obvious correlation was shown among p53 autoantibodies status,p53 mRNA level and p53 protein expression in immunohistochemistry.p53 autoantibody positive patients had statistically significant longer survival time than p53 autoantibody negative patients.CONCLUSIONS The ratio of positive to negative expression of serum p53 autoantibodies is lower in normal control.Glioma patients' serum p53 autoantibodies evidently responded to polypeptides.Peptide microarray technology,which was used to detect serum p53 autoantibodies,has certain effects in diagnosis and prognosis of glioma patient.This finding has great value in postoperative follow-up and prognostic judgement of glioma patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?