Comparative study on effects of droloxifene and tamoxifen on multidrug resistance in K562/A02 cell line

李杰,郭伟剑,夏鹏,陈瑛
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2005.01.012
2005-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To study the reversal effects of droloxifene (DRO) and tamoxifen (TAM) on MDR in K562/A02.METHODS:K562 cell line resistant to adriamycin (ADR) cell line (K562/A02) and K562 cell line sensitive to ADR (K562) were treated with DRO and TAM, respectively. By using tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay, effects of various concentrations of DRO and TAM on MDR in K562/A02 was studied. Before and after the treatment with 10 mmol/L of DRO and TAM, MDR1 and GSTpi genes, expressions were assayed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunocytochemistry (ICC) assay. By using flow cytometry (FCM), intracellular ADR concentration was measured. RESULTS:DRO and TAM significantly reversed MDR in K562/A02, respectively. After 20, 10, and 5 mmol/L of DRO and TAM treatment, the reversal times had significant differences between DRO and TAM. After 10 mmol/L DRO and TAM treatment, both MDR1 and GSTpi mRNA genes, expressions began to decline on the second day,and significantly decreased on the fifth day,P0.01. Changes of P-gp and GSTpi protein expressions were similar to those of their mRNA expressions. Two hours after 20 mmol/L DRO and TAM treatment, intracellular ADR concentration increased to 2.9 and 3.0 times respectively. However, both agents did not significantly increase ADR accumulation in K562. CONCLUSIONS:Reversal activity of DRO is similar to that of TAM. Both agents have strong reversal effects. The reverse is via different routes, i.e, down regulating mRNA and protein expression levels of MDR1/P-gp and GSTpi, and increasing intracellular drug concentration. Since DRO has low toxicity, it might have good prospects in clinical application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?