Abstract:J Thorac Dis 2020;12(8):4578-4580 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1930 We thank Prof. Giles et al. from Canada for their thoughtful comments and suggestions about our recent article (1). Our group published a study in Anesth Analg, reporting that a 2-week, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation strategy could produce clinically relevant improvements of perioperative functional capacity assessed via the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in patients undergoing videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer (2). In this randomized controlled study, we enrolled 73 patients (37 in the prehabilitation group and 36 in the control group). The simple home-based, multimodal prehabilitation program includes aerobic and resistance exercises, respiratory training, nutrition counseling with whey protein supplementation, and psychological guidance utilizing a pictured instruction booklet, completion diaries, and regular visits to encourage adherence. Many studies have been published regarding preoperative exercise for lung cancer. However, though positive conclusions are often reported, heterogeneity is extremely obvious from differences in interventions, and population and outcome measurements, especially preoperative training interventions (3). All exercise modes in the published literature focus mainly on aerobic exercise with or without resistance exercise and inspiratory muscle training (IMT) (4-12). However, our study contributed most to the innovation of patient-centered multimodal prehabilitation methods for patients undergoing VATS lobectomy by including respiratory training, nutritional supplements, and psychological optimization. Based on our limited clinical practice experience, we also made improvements to exercise duration, modality, and place compared with other forms of preoperative training associated with pulmonary surgery. Instead of advocating fixed forms of exercise, our patients could choose any form of aerobic exercise at their discretion with restrained frequencies, durations, and intensities to improve acceptance (4-8,11,12). Considering that the urge to proceed with surgery requires shorter exercise interventions, the duration of prehabilitation was simplified to approximately 2 weeks, compared with 4–8 weeks in most published studies (4,8-11). We found that it was also more convenient for patients to perform the prehabilitation program at home under various types of guidance including telephone follow-up (8). We therefore tried to establish a more flexible, feasible, and economical way of benefitting the clinical wide-range application of prehabilitation programs that may occur in the near future. As noted by Giles et al., both intervention and control groups in our analysis were primarily fit and young (mean, 56 years old), with baseline pulmonary functions within normal levels (FEV1 and FVC >90% predicted, FEV1/ FVC >70%), although the inclusion criteria were not strictly restricted to age (adult patients <70 years old) or preoperative pulmonary function. Giles et al. commented that these factors might limit the generalizability and practical significance of this study, which we also mentioned in our publication. However, we noted a rising trend of lung cancer incidence in females and in the younger population in China (13,14), and the fact that increasing numbers of Letter to the Editor

Current status and progress of preoperative pulmonary function evaluation in patients with lung cancer

Application Value of Pre-operative Pulmonary Rehabilitation Exercise Training in Patients with Lung Cancer

[Status of Perioperative Airway Management in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer].

Rapid Recovery of Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients with Lung Cancer and Influencing Factors

Pulmonary function evaluation and risk factors in patients accompanied with respiratory insufficiency

Evaluation of preoperative cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk of patients undergoing lung cancer resection

Current Status and Prospective of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Management System in Lung Cancer

Clinical evaluation of preoperative pathological examinations for the diagnosis of lung cancer

Preoperative Lymph Node Assessment in Surgically Resected Pathologic T1 Lung Cancer Patients: Real World Clinical Practice in China.

Surgical Treatments of Chinese Patients with Lung Malignant Tumors.

Surgical techniques and perioperative management of lung transplantation:a report of 3 cases

Summary of the Best Evidence for Preoperative Pre-Rehabilitation in Patients with Lung Cancer Complicated with COPD

Effects of Pulmonary Function Training on the Lung Function and Surgical Tolerance of Lung Cancer Patients with Obstructive Ventilatory Defects

[Investigation of Lung Cancer Patients Complicated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Thoracic Surgical Department].

Prehabilitation for Older Adults Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review and Needs Assessment

Prehabilitation in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: Current Situation and Future Perspectives

&Lt;p>impact of Preoperative Exercise Therapy on Surgical Outcomes in Lung Cancer Patients with or Without COPD: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</p>

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Screening and Pre-Operative Pulmonary Rehabilitation Reduce Postoperative Complications and Improve Fast-Track Recovery after Lung Cancer Surgery: A Study for 342 Cases.

Side Effect of Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Lung Cancer Patients and the Progress of Anesthesia Management

Effect of Preoperative Pulmonary Pehabilitation in Patients with Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Society for Translational Medicine Expert Consensus on the preoperative assessment of circulatory and cardiac functions and criteria for the assessment of risk factors in patients with lung cancer