Meta-analysis of image-guided brain tumor resection

Wenfei Li,Chen Niu,Liping Guo,Fengli Liang,Xueying Ma,Enfa Zhao,Yafei Zhang,Ming Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2017.06.011

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective:We did a Meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of image-guided brain tumor resection and contrast traditional surgical treatment.Methods:We searched randomized controlled studies in PubMed,CBM,Co-chrane library,Web of Science database to November 15,2014.Using RevMan 5.3 software to analyze data.To calcu-late the odds ratio(OR)and 95%confidence intervals,test heterogeneity of source,use funnel plot to assess publication bias.Results:10 randomized controlled studies(RCT),a total of 669 patients,including image-guided surgery 329 cases,340 cases of traditional surgery.Meta-analysis showed that:Compared with traditional surgery,image-guided brain tumor resection total resection rate was higher,the low incidence of postoperative dysfunction,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In total removal rate there was no significant difference(P>0.05)between differ-ent image navigation.But in terms of postoperative dysfunction,intraoperative MRI was superior to ultrasound,ultra-sound superior to DTI(P=0.02).Conclusion:Imaging navigation brain tumor resection compared to conventional surgery can improve the rate of total resection of the tumor,protect functional area,reduce the incidence of postopera-tive complications and improve the patient's life quality.