Clinicopathologic analysis of malignant solitary fibrous tumors and review of the literature

Tantan Liu,Zhaoxiang Zhang,Shirong Ma,Yingmei Wang,Peizhen Hu,Shoujing Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2017.10.029
2017-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the clinicopathological features,immunophenotyping,diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the malignant solitary fibrous tumors (MSFT) for clarifying the diagnostic criteria.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the data of 7 cases MSFTs have been conducted from Dec 2011 to May 2014 by evaluating the follow-up results and related articles.Results:Among the 7 patients,3 were male,and 4 were female.The age were 33~72 years old,with the average age of 47.9 years old.The tumor sites reported here were kidney,prostate,retroperitoneum,tentorium cerebelli,scapular region,occiput and vola respectively,with the greatest diameter of those tumors varying from 2.8~11.2cm.Although some of these cases retained the special features of benign SFT,some malignant characteristics were present in all of those cases,including high cellularity,pleomorphism,more than 4 mitotic figures per 10HPFs,hemorrhage and necrosis.In addition,one special case showed epithelioid differentiation in focal areas with structures of small solid nests or pseudoglands arranged by oval or round tumor cells.Immunohistochemical studies revealed that tumor cells were strongly positive for vimentin,while the markers of CD34,CD99 and BCL-2 showed different expression,and the positive rate of STAT6 was 85.7%.Besides that,two cases focally expressed Keratin,one focally expressed EMA and another one focally expressed Calponin.Conclusion:The paper have made a comprehensive analysis of MSFTs in this article,and first reported the case containing the features of epithelioid differentiation in focal areas.Unlike benign SFT,most MSFTs did not co-express those three markers including CD34,CD99 and BCL-2.Having high rates of recurrence and metastasis,the prognosis of patients is not good.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?