The study of BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 gene mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis and its significance of clinical findings

Kaixuan Zeng,Ying Guo,Yixiong Liu,Weichen Zhang,Yuehua Zhang,Mingyang Li,Xia Li,Jie Wei,Yang Lv,Danhui Zhao,Zhe Wang,Qingguo Yan,Shuangping Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.01.001
2016-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective:To study BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 gene mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis and analyze the relationship between the two mutations and clinical findings.Methods:Sanger sequencing was used to de-tect gene mutations.Immunohistochemistry was used to detect BRAF V600E protein expression.χ2 test was used to analyze the relation between mutations and clinical items(age,gender,single /multi -system disease,etc).Results:Among 35 cases of Langerhans cell histiocytosis(LCH)the ratio between male and female was 1.7∶1.The primary site of bone were found in 82.9% of the cases.97.1% of the cases belonged to single system disease and only 2.9%belonged to multiple system disease.The incidence rate of BARF V600E mutation was 17.1%,while that of MAP2K1 mutation was 14.3%.The two mutations were mutually exclusive.The mutation of BRAF V600E detected by immu-nostaining was 28.6% which covered all mutated cases detected by Sanger sequencing.The incidence rate of BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 gene mutations was 35.7% and 28.6% respectively in under -age patients.The incidence rate of the two gene mutations (4.8%)was same in adult patients.Conclusion:LCH patients in our study mostly be-longed to single system disease .The bone was mostly involved.The prognosis was good with 5 years survival of 97.1%.The incidence rate of BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 mutation was lower than that of western countries.The BRAF V600E mutation significantly occurred more in under -age patients than adult patients.All of the mutated MAP2K1 was point mutation without any in -framed deletion as reported by foreign country.The new point mutation was also found:c.112 G >A p.E38K.It may indicate that the pathogenetic mechanism maybe different in different age groups of LCH patients.The two mutations had no effect on survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?