Abstract:Background The long-term prognosis of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for early cervical cancer is controversial. This study mainly discusses the feasibility and effectiveness of the endocutter in radical laparoscopic hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. Methods A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy on patients with FIGO stage IA1 (lymphovascular invasion), IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer, between January 2020 and July 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH) groups. The ORH group used right-angle sealing forceps for vaginal stump closure, whereas the LRH group used endoscopic staplers. The primary outcomes included the evaluation of the patient’s perioperative indicators, as well as short- and long-term complications. Recurrence and overall survival were considered secondary outcomes. Results As of July 2021, 17 patients were enrolled in the laparoscopic surgery group and 17 in the open surgery group. The hospitalization time of the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than those of the open group (15 min vs. 9 min, P < 0.001). The vaginal stump closure time in the laparoscopic group was longer than that in the open surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Post-operative catheter removal ( P = 0.72), drainage tube removal time ( P = 0.27), number of lymph node dissections ( P = 0.72), and incidence of intraoperative and post-operative complications between the two groups ( P > 0.05). The median blood loss in the laparoscopic group was 278 ml, and it was 350 ml in the laparotomy group. The intraoperative blood transfusion rate was lower in the laparoscopic group; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.175). Vaginal margin pathology and peritoneal lavage cytology were negative, and all the patient’s vaginal stumps healed without infection. The median follow-up time of the laparoscopic group was 20.5 months, and it was 22 months for the open surgery group. There was no recurrence in all patients during the follow-up period. Conclusions Modified LRH with endocutter closure of the vaginal stump is an effective approach and not inferior to ORH in treating patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Trial registration ChiCTR2000030160, date of registration February 26, 2020 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=49809 ).

Application of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

Comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lym-phadenectomy with traditional laparotomy for the treatment of early u-terine malignancy

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer

Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

Comparative Analysis Between Laparoscopic Operation and Laparotomy in Treating Early Stage of Cervical and Endometrial Carcinomas

A Case-control Study on Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: a Multicenter Study in China

Clinical analysis of 237 cases of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer

[Preliminary Study on Laparoscopically Robotic Assisted Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy on Cervical Cancer.].

Clinical comparative analysis of laparoscopic and transabdominal radical hysterectomy

Clinical Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Malignant Uterine Tumors:Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy

Comparison laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with open surgery for early stage cervical cancer in elderly patients

A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience

Laparoscopic Radical Surgery In Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Short-Term And Long-Term Outcomes And Survival Analysis

Standardized radical hysterectomy promises the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for early-stage cervical cancer

Effect of Modified Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: a Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

The clinical study of aparoscopy in patients with malignant uterine tumors in early stage

Laparoscope Versus Laparotomy in Treatment of Early-stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

Progress of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer

Clinic Research of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Abdominopelvic Lymphadenectomy

Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis