Value of Transgastric Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Diagnosis of Ascites of Unknown Origin

Shan Li,Jing Chen,Hongbo Wu,Mei Yang,Li Liu,Wensheng Chen,Lei Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2019.09.012
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To assess clinical value of transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in diagnoses of patients with ascites of unknown origin. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent NOTES (32 cases) and laparoscopic surgery (32 cases) and were diagnosed as ascites of unknown origin in our institute from April 2016 to March 2019. Patients’ diagnosed rate, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, hospital stay, operation time and hospitalization costs were statistically analyzed. Results: Diagnosed rate in the NOTES group was 84. 4% while that in the laparoscopic group was 93. 8% , and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P=1. 44). Abdominal infection, bleeding from incision of stomach wall or abdominal wall, perforation, puncture fistula, incision fistula or other complications after surgery were not observed in both groups. The surgical time was shorter in the NOTES group than that in the laparoscopic group (P<0. 001). The visual analogue scale of postoperative pain was lower in the NOTES group than that in the laparoscopic surgery group (P=0. 003). There were no statistically signif- icant differences in hospital stay and hospitalization costs between two groups. Conclusion: Transgastric NOTES is a safe, valid and economical method in diagnoses of patients with ascites of unknown origin, with high diagnosis rate, minimal inva-sion and few complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?