Microsatellite Instability in Sporadic Multiple Primary Colorectal Carcinoma

董锐增,蔡宏,莫善兢,王亚农,朱蕙燕,徐晓丽
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-170x.2005.05.015
IF: 4.501
2005-01-01
Journal of Oncology
Abstract:[Purpose] To investigate the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) in sporadic multiple primary colorectal carcinomas (MCRC) and to assess the relationship between MSI and the prognosis of sporadic MCRC or the occurrence of metachronous MCRC. [Methods] From 1985 to 2000, 124 paraffinembedded specimens from 70 sporadic MCRC patients with data integrity and 35 specimens from sporadic single colorectal cancer patients followed up over 3 years were available to determine MSI.DNA of these specimens was examined for two microsatellite marks (BAT25 and BAT26).Microsatellite instability phenotype was defined as alterations in both loci. MSI and clinicopathologic parameters were compared by χ2 test. [Results] In sporadic MCRC, 32 carcinomas(25.8%) in 21 patients(30.0%) showed MSIH. While only 2 carcinomas showed MSIH(5.7%) in sporadic single colorectal carcinomas(25.8% vs. 5.7%, P=0.01). MSIH was detected with higher frequency in metachronous carcinomas than that in synchronous carcinomas(36.7% vs. 15.6%, P=0.007). Positive rate in young patients less than 40 years old was higher than that in more than 40 years old(53.8% vs. 22.5%, P=0.015), and that in rightsided colon was higher than that in left sided colon(41.2% vs. 15.1%, P=0.001). The positive rates of MSIH in Dukes'A, B, C and D were 25.0%, 33.3%, 22.2% and 11.1% respectively(P0.05). The positive rate of MSIH in high differentiation adenocarcinomas was 20.0%, 25.9% in moderate differentiation adenocarcinomas, 21.1% in low differentiation adenocarcinomas, 31.6% inmucinous adenocarcinomas(P0.05). Mean followup period was 61 months(range 6~209, median 46). [Conclusions] MSI may be regarded as an independent and important risk factor for predicting occurrence of metachronous of MCRC. MSI may be suitable as a marker for predicting the prognosis of sporadic MCRC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?