Abstract:OBJECTIVES:Major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with anhedonia tend to have a poor prognosis. The underlying imaging basis for anhedonia in MDD remains largely unknown. The relationship between nodal properties and anhedonia in MDD patients need to be further investigated. Herein, this study aims to explore differences of cerebral functional node characteristics in MDD patients with severe anhedonia (MDD-SA) and MDD patients with mild anhedonia (MDD-MA) before and after the antidepressant treatment.METHODS:Ninety participants with current MDD were recruited in this study. 24-Item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24) and Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) were used to assess the severity of depression and anhedonia at baseline and the end of 6-months treatment. The MDD patients who scored above the 25th percentile on the SHAPS were assigned to an MDD-SA group (n=19), while those who scored below the 25th percentile were assigned to an MDD-MA group (n=18). All patients in the 2 groups received antidepressant treatment. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) images of all the patients were collected at baseline and the end of 6-months treatment. Graph theory was applied to analyze the patients' cerebral functional nodal characteristics, which were measured by efficiency (ei) and degree (ki).RESULTS:Repeated measures 2-factor ANCOVA showed significant main effects on group on the ei and ki values of left superior frontal gyrus (LSFG) (P=0.003 and P=0.008, respectively), and on the ei and ki values of left medial orbital-frontal gyrus (LMOFG) (P=0.004 and P=0.008, respectively). Compared with the MDD-MA group, the significantly higher ei and ki values of the LSFG (P=0.015 and P=0.021, respectively), and the significantly higher ei and ki values of the LMOFG (P=0.015 and P=0.037, respectively) were observed in the MDD-SA group at baseline. Meanwhile, higher SHAPS scores could result in higher ei and ki values of LSFG (P=0.019 and P=0.026, respectively), and higher ei value of LMOFG (P=0.040) at baseline; higher SHAPS scores could result in higher ei values of LSFG (P=0.049) at the end of 6-months treatment. The multiple linear regression analysis revealed that sex were negatively correlated with the ei and ki values of LSFG (r= -0.014, P=0.004; r=-1.153, P=0.001, respectively). The onset age of MDD was negatively correlated with the ki value of LSFG (r=-0.420, P=0.034) at the end of 6-months treatment. We also found that SHAPS scores at baseline were positively correlated with the HAMD-24 scores (r=0.387, P=0.022) at the end of 6-months treatment.CONCLUSIONS:There are obvious differences in nodal properties between the MDD-SA and the MDD-MA patients, such as the high ei of LSFG in the MDD-SA patients, which may be associated with the severity of anhedonia. These nodal properties could be potential biomarkers for the prognosis of MDD. The increased ei and ki values in the LSFG of MDD-SA patients may underlie a compensatory mechanism or protective mechanism. The mechanism may be an important component of the pathological mechanism of MDD-SA. The poor prognosis in the MDD-SA patients suggests that anhedonia may predict a worse prognosis in MDD patients. Sex and onset age of MDD may affect the nodal properties of LSFG at baseline and the end of 6-months treatment.

Characteristics of feedback negativity of anhedonia in depression

Association of Anhedonia with Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Interleukin-10 in Major Depressive Disorder

The Impacts of Anhedonia on Brain Functional Alterations in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Regional Homogeneity.

Increased Ratio of Mature BDNF to Precursor-Bdnf in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder with Severe Anhedonia.

Volume Changes of the Subcortical Limbic Structures in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with and Without Anhedonia.

Aberrant Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity in Major Depressive Disorder with and Without Anhedonia.

Altered Hippocampal Subfield Volumes in Major Depressive Disorder with and Without Anhedonia.

Hypersensitivity to Negative Feedback During Dynamic Risky-Decision Making in Major Depressive Disorder: an Event-Related Potential Study.

Reduced Sensitivity to Neutral Feedback Versus Negative Feedback in Subjects with Mild Depression: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials Study

Frontolimbic response to negative feedback in clinical depression

Blunted stimulus-preceding negativity during reward anticipation in major depressive disorder

Define and characterize the anhedonia in major depressive disorder: An explorative study

Blunted Neural Effects of Perceived Control on Reward Feedback in Major Depressive Disorder.

Aberrant reward dynamics in depression with anticipatory anhedonia

A comparative study of anhedonia components between major depression and schizophrenia in Chinese populations

White Matter Microstructural Abnormalities and Their Association with Anticipatory Anhedonia in Depression.

Altered coordination between frontal delta and parietal alpha networks underlies anhedonia and depressive rumination in major depressive disorder

Disrupted Reward and Cognitive Control Networks Contribute to Anhedonia in Depression.

Anxiety and feedback negativity.

High Efficiency of Left Superior Frontal Gyrus and the Symptom Features of Major Depressive Disorder.

Motivational deficits in effort-based decision making in individuals with subsyndromal depression, first-episode and remitted depression patients.