Methodology Improvements in China Mental Disorder Epidemiological Surveys from 1950 to 2008

钟宝亮,张建芳,何民富,黄悦勤,陈红辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2010.04.014
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the advances of methodology in China mental disorder epidemiological surveys from 1950 to 2008. Methods Using bibliometrics approach, a number of English (PubMed, EMBASE) and Chinese databases (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Database Disc and Wanfang Database), related reports and literature reviews' references list were comprehensively searched between Jan. 1, 1950 and Dec. 22, 2008, Chinese Journal of Neurology & Psychiatry (from 1955 to 1996) was also searched by hand, and the large-scale regional mental disorder epidemiological surveys were collected. Taking time as clue, the methodological characteristics in study design, sample size calculation, sampling method, diagnostic evaluation tool, field work quality control,etc., was analyzed. Results Totally 39 surveys, including 1 children and adolescents mental disorder epidemiological survey, were searched out. All the surveys from 1958 to 1981 were censuses without diagnostic evaluation tool. In the surveys from 1982 to 2000 compared to the ones from 2001 to 2008, 0(0/16) and 25.0% (4/16) of the studies reported the sample size estimation method, 0.0% (0/20) and 12.5% (2/16) of them reported the implementation of informed consent, 5.0% (1/20) and 31.2% (5/16)of them reported the adoption of field work quality control approaches, respectively. Conclusions The methodological quality has been increasing in recent years, but the overall methodological level is irregular and uneven. More attention must be attached to the methodological design. There is a pressing need to conduct mental disorder epidemiological survey among children and adolescents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?