Analysis of the clinicopathological features, prognosis and causes of omitting diagnosis in melanoma cases with false-negative sentinel lymph nodes

赖玉梅,刘佳勇,徐妙生,谭智超,黄小征,吴艳,周立新,宋志杰,田晓鑫,李忠武
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101548-20200622-00080
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the clinicopathological features, prognosis and possible causes of omitting diagnosis in cutaneous malignant melanoma cases with false-negative sentinel lymph nodes(SLN), and try to find ways to improve the positive detection rate of SLN.Methods:Thirty nine cases of malignant melanoma with false-negative SLN biopsy in Peking University Cancer Hospital and Beijing Southern Suburb Cancer Hospital between 2009 to 2018 were collected, and their clinicopathological features and prognosis were analyzed. The possible reasons for missed detection were studied by reviewing the original HE sections, thinly cutting tissue and immunohistochemical staining.Results:There were 39 false-negative cases, and the false-negative rate was 26%. Features of primary lesions showed that the most common site was lower extremities (64%), the median Breslow thickness was 4.0 mm with 71% of them in Clark level Ⅳ, ulcer was seen in 59% of these cases, and a mitotic rate more than 2 per square millimeters was found in 60% of them. The proportion of cases with Breslow thickness more than 4.0 mm was significantly higher in patients who underwent skin transitional metastasis or recurrence prior to regional lymph node metastasis than in other patients. After a 16.7~137.2 months' follow-up, the 5-year melanoma specific survival rate was 67.6%, and the median survival time was 70.2 months. Multivariate analysis showed that the prognosis of the group aged <60 years was significantly worse than that of the group aged ≥60 years. After thorough pathological reviews, 10 cases were finally detected positive, with a positive detection rate of 25.6%, and the false negative rate of SLN after review was 19%. Four cases were detected with median power review of the original HE section, all of which were found in the marginal sinus with a diameter ≤0.2 mm and mainly a nevus like morphology. Five cases were positive after thinly cutting tissue, and 4 cases of them showed a diameter between 1.8 to 4.5 mm, among which 2 cases were found in the area where the original HE section was not completely sliced. Three cases were ambiguous after morphological review and SOX-10 staining was used, and one case with a micro metastasis was detected.Conclusions:Positive SLNs detected after review were mostly micro metastases in the marginal sinus. Full and intact exposure of the submembranous tissue of SLN, careful examination of the slides and immunohistochemical staining are helpful to improve the positive detection rate of SLN. In terms of prognosis, multivariate analysis showed that age <60 years old was a poor prognostic factor for SLN false negative melanoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?