Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Levels of Plasma S-100β, Neuron Specific Enolase and Neuroglobin in Patients with Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization
Yi-jue ZHANG,Wei-ping TAO,Wei-wei LIN,Wei CUI,Shi-jian YU,Pei-qing GE,Jun ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0678.2017.04.004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Aim To evaluate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on plasma S-100β,Neuron specific enolase (NSE) and neuroglobin (Ngb) in patients with unrupture cerebral aneurysm undergoing embolization.Methods Forty-seven patients were randomly assigned into either remote ischemic preconditioning group (RIPC group,25 cases) or the control group (22 cases).In RIPC group,RIPC was performed in left limb after anesthesia induction before the embolization,which consisted of cuff inflation to 200 mmHg for 3 × 5 min alternating with 5 min of intermittent reperfusion by complete cuff deflation.In the control group,the cuff was placed around the same limb,and no inflation and deflation were performed.The blood samples were collected before RIPC performed (T0),after RIPC process (T1) and 24 h after the operation (T2).All serum samples were detected by ELISA for S-100β,NSE and Ngb.Results No difference were found in the S-100β and NSE between the groups nor in the group.In the control group,the concentration of Ngb was significantly decreased compared with the baseline and RIPC group at 24 hour after the operation,meanwhile the Ngb in RIPC group didn't change significantly.Conclusion RIPC could inhibit the protective biomarker (Ngb) decline after the aneurysm embolization.Meanwhile,the process had no effect on the S-100β,NSE in serum.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?