Analysis for Clinical Features of Cerebellar Infarction in 119 Patients
Jing WU,Wei CHEN,You-rong DONG,Yu ZHAI,Xu-hong SUN,Hui PAN,Qiang LI,Jie FANG,Jian-ren LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0678.2016.06.009
2016-01-01
Abstract:ABSTRACT Aim To investigate the etiological type of Chinese Ischemic Stroke Subclassiifcation (CISS), the lesion distribution, the concomitant lesions outside the cerebellum and the clinical manifestations in patients with acute cerebellar infarction.MethodsThe MRI images, the etiological examination ifndings and the clinical manifestations of 119 patients with acute cerebellar infarction who were admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAmong 119 cases of cerebellar infarction patients, 78 cases were classiifed to unilateral cerebellar infarction (UCI), 41 caseswere bilateral cerebellar infarction (BCI). The main etiological type of CISS was large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), followed by cardiogenic stroke (CS), mixing mechanism, penetrating artery disease (PAD) and other etiologies. There was no signiifcant difference in CISS between the BCI group and the UCI group. In the UCI group, posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) infarction had the highest occurrence rate (36%), and there was a difference between the two groups (P<0.01). PICA+SCA infarction had the highest occurrence rate (39%) in the BCI group, but there was no signiifcant difference between the two groups; the remaining territory infarction occurrence rate in the two groups had no difference. 63 cases (52.9%) had concomitant lesions outside the cerebellum. The incidence of concomitant lesions outside the cerebellum in posterior circulation of BCI group (54%) was higher than that of the UCI group (P<0.05), while the incidence of concomitant anterior circulation lesions of the UCI group was higher than that of the BCI group (P<0.05). The main symptoms and signs included dizziness/vertigo, nystagmus, OTR, hearing impairment, cerebellar dysarthria, ataxia, and superifcial sensory disturbance, pyramidal tract sign and disturbance of consciousness. The incidence of conscious disturbance in the BCI group was higher than that in the UCI group (P<0.01), but there were no signiifcant differences of other symptoms and signs between the two groups.Conclusion <br> The main etiology of cerebellar infarction was large artery atherosclerosis, PICA infarction could be observed most frequently in unilateral cerebellar infarction. Bilateral cerebellar infarction was often associated with concomitant lesions outside the cerebellum in posterior circulation. Unilateral and bilateral cerebellar infarction had certain differences in cerebellar artery involvement and concomitant lesions outside the cerebellum, prompting difference of their mechanism. Bilateral cerebellar infarction tended to present more conscious disturbance and other serious CNS function defect than unilateral cerebellar infarction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?