Outcome Comparison of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Large Artery Atherosclerosis and Cardioembolism in the Chinese Population: Data from the ANGEL Registry
Guangcai Shao,Xiang Li,Meiyue Da,Xiaochuan Huo,Shuheng Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s442339
IF: 3.829
2024-02-26
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Guangcai Shao, 1 Xiang Li, 2 Meiyue Da, 1 Xiaochuan Huo, 3 Shuheng Zhang 1 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Anshan Central Hospital, Anshan, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China; 3 Cerebrovascular Disease Department, Neurological Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Shuheng Zhang, Department of Neurosurgery, Anshan Central Hospital, No. 77 South Zhonghua Road, Tiedong District, Anshan, 114009, People's Republic of China, Tel +8618804120515, Email Xiaochuan Huo, Cerebrovascular Disease Department, Neurological Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Email Background and Purpose: Studies on outcome comparison after endovascular treatment (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) between large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolism (CE) in the Asian population are scarce. We aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes after EVT for anterior circulation LVO with LAA and CE in the Chinese population. Methods: Patients were selected from the ANGEL registry and divided into LAA and CE groups. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0– 2. The secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS distribution, 90-day mRS 0– 1, 90-day mRS 0– 3, and early neurological improvement. The safety outcomes included death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and any intracranial hemorrhage. We conducted logistic regression models with adjustments to compare the outcomes. Results: A total of 632 patients were included, of whom, 488 were in the LAA group and 144 were in the CE group. No significant difference in 90-day mRS 0– 2 was observed between LAA and CE groups (55.7%vs.43.1%, odds ratio[OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval(CI), 0.92– 1.53, P=0.190). The LAA group exhibited a higher frequency of mRS 0– 3 compared to the CE group (69.1% vs 32.6%, OR1.32, 95% CI 1.02– 1.72, P=0.038). However, the incidence of death within 90 days did not significantly differ between the LAA and CE groups (10.9%vs.24.3%, OR0.91, 95% CI0.66– 1.25, P=0.545), nor did the occurrences of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(SICH) (4.5%vs.9.7%,OR1.08, 95% CI 0.65– 1.78, P=0.779) or intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) (21.9%vs.30.6%, OR 0.94, 95% CI0.71– 1.25, P=0.680). Moreover, no significant disparities were detected in other outcomes between the two groups (All P> 0.05). Conclusion: In the ANGEL registry, a higher prevalence of patients undergoing EVT for acute anterior circulation LVO with LAA was found than those with CE. However, our study revealed that the efficacy and safety of EVT remained consistent regardless of the stroke's etiology such as LAA or CE. Keywords: large vessel occlusion, endovascular treatment, large artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism The efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation have been extensively studied by several landmark randomized controlled trials. 1 The Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) standard has been widely used to assess the stroke etiology widely. 2 Large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolism (CE) are the two main etiologies of LVO. Previous studies reported that the characteristics such as stroke severity 3 and collateral status 4 of LVO and CE were different, potentially influencing the outcomes of EVT for LVO. The effect comparison of EVT between LAA and CE has been studied widely in the Western population. 3–6 However, the literature on this topic in the Asian population still remains scarce. 7,8 Hence, the present study based on a nationwide, multicenter, prospective registry database in China, aimed to compare baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes after EVT for anterior circulation LVO stemming from LAA and CE. Patients were selected from the ANGEL (Acute Ischemic stroke Cooperation Group of Endovascular Treatment) registry, 9 which was a multicenter, nationwide, prospective registry study including 20 comprehensive stroke centers in China between June 2015 and December 2017. Full methods of the ANGEL registry such as inclusion/exclusion criteria were reported previously. 9 The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and all participating centers. Subjects or their legally authorized representatives provided written informed consent. The inclusion criterion of the present stu -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology