[Atypical Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: a Clinicopathological Analysis of Eight Cases].
Q X Gong,Q H Fan,Y Ding,Q X Xiao,Q Y Wang,J L Tang,Q Y Song,B Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2019.08.007
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the clinicopathological features, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of atypical epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE). Methods: Eight cases of atypical EHEs were collected from Jiangsu Province Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University) between 2010 and 2018. EnVision method and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to detect immunophenotype, WWTR1-CAMTA1 and TFE3 gene rearrangement, respectively. Results: There were 4 males and 4 females, ranging from 42 to 59 years (median 47.5 years). The tumors located in soft tissue (3 cases), lung (3 cases), liver (1 case) and chest wall (1 case). One soft tissue EHE involved also adjacent fibula and pleural involvement was present in all three lung cases at the diagnosis. Regional lymph node metastases were present in two cases (one involving soft tissue tumor and one involving liver). Morphologically, the tumor cells were epithelioid with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, moderate to marked nuclear pleomorphism, irregular nuclear membrane, unevenly chromatin, and prominent nucleoli. The cells arranged in cords, small nests or solid pattern. The mitotic rate was 4.3 mitoses/2 mm(2) on average (ranging 2 to 9). Tumor necrosis was seen in every case. Among all 8 cases, blister cells were found upon careful observation. Myxohyaline stroma was present in 6 cases. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells expressed CD31 (8/8), CD34 (7/8), ERG (8/8), CKpan (2/7), and CAMTA1 (4/6). None of the tested cases stained for TFE3 (0/6). WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion gene by FISH was found in all tested 6 cases and TFE3 gene rearrangement was not detected in any. Available clinical follow-up was obtained in 7 cases and the intervals range from 6 to 55 months (average 19.6 months). Six patients had metastasis and 3 patients died of disease. One patient was alive with no evidence of disease. Conclusions: Atypical EHE is a more aggressive tumor than classic EHE, with histological features including high nuclear grade, increased mitotic activity, the presence of solid growth pattern and tumor necrosis. The differential diagnoses include epithelioid angiosarcoma, carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.