Rescue Glucocorticoid Treatments for Refractory Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Ziwen GAO,Yanhong DAI,Jie HOU,Hui QI,Wenyan ZHU,Wandong SHE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2017.06.020
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To report outcomes of various rescue glucocorticoid treatment regimens for refractory sud-den sensorineural hearing loss(SSNHL).Methods Three hundred and five cases(305 ears)of SSNHL that had failed more than 10 days of conventional therapy were divided into a study group(SG,277 ears)and a comparison group(CG,28 ears).Patients in the SG received glucocorticoids via a micro-catheter inserted into the tympanum qd for 10 consecu-tive days plus i.v.transfusion of gingko extracts and monosialotetrahexosylganglioside(group A,206 ears),4 doses of postaural injection of glucocorticoids every 3 days plus i.v.transfusion of gingko extracts and monosialotetrahexosylgan-glioside(group B,42 ears)or 4 does of postaural injection of glucocorticoids every three days plus oral (group C,19 ears).Patients in the CG received only i.v.transfusion of gingko extracts and monosialotetrahexosylganglioside.All pa-tients in both SG and CG were maintained on oral gingko extracts and vitamin B12 following rescue therapy and fol-lowed up for 3 months.Results The effective rate in the SG was significantly higher than in the CG (χ2=14.11,P=0.003).The average PTA improvement was 11.63⊥16.75 dB (Group A),17.78⊥18.12 dB (Group B) and 18.38⊥22.9dB(Group C)respectively for the SG,but only 4.85 dB for the CG(t=2.75,P=0.043).When treatment was started within 3 weeks post-disease onset,effective rates showed no statistically significant difference between intratympanic and postaural injection of glucocorticoids (P>0.05).Conclusion The rescue glucocorticoids injection treatments em-ployed in the SG in this study appear to be beneficial as compared to no rescue treatments.While the interval from dis-ease onset to therapy can affected treatment efficacy,when started within 3 weeks from disease onset,intratympanic glu-cocorticoid perfusion appears to be similarly effective as postauricular glucocorticoids injection only.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?