Experimental study of the effects of platelet-rich fibrin in the regeneration of bone defects

江建林,叶平,吴润发,白彭,段志坚,黄忞,康维博,谢晨
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in bone regeneration in experi-mental bone defect and to explore its reasons to provide a reference for its clinical research and appli-cations. Method: Six 8-12 month healthy male goats were used for this study and three round shaped defects(5mm diameter, 2mm deep) were formed in the buccal ridge of the bilateral mandibular anterior edentulous area by using the method of self control. The three defects were divided into three groups (Group A、Group B and Group C). Group A received PRF membranes as the experimental group; Group B received Haiao collagen membranes as the standard control group; Group C did not received any grafts as the blank control group. Animals were killed at 4、8 and 12 weeks after operation. The speci-mens were examined by gross observation、X-ray、HE histologic observation to compared the osteogenic effect. HPIAS-2000H high-resolution colour pathological graph-text analytical system was used to cal-culate the percentage of new formed bone area. SPSS 13.0 for statistical analysis. Results: At 4 weeks, there were less new bone formation, fewer osteoblasts, more fibers in the blank control group than those in the experimental group and standard control group. At 8 weeks, in the experimental group and stan-dard control group, the new formed bone thickened and connected into networks, the quantities of os-teoblasts were encreased and the fibrous tissue decreased. While in the blank control group there is rel-atively thin trabeculae, more fibrous tissue. At 12 weeks, the experimental group and standard control group showed visible lamellar structure and thicker trabeculae, while the blank control group showed no lamellar structure. Bone histomorphometry analysis: the percentage of new bone area at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks in the experimental group (35.92±3.89,60.72±4.53,74.73±3.64 respectively)were higher than those in the blanck control group (22.56 ±4.59,52.18 ±5.31,66.77 ±4.52 respectively), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The percentage of new bone area at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks in the experimental group were not significantly different from those in the standard con-trol group(34.36±3.61,61.95±5.24,76.24±3.35 respectively)(P> 0.05). Conclusions: PRF is effective in promoting bone regeneration in the experimental bone defect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?