Comparison of two surgical approaches for Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty

Hao TIAN,Line WANG,Shusheng GONG,Youxiang MA,Jing XIE,Shuguang HAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16542/j.cnki.issn.1007-4856.2018.01.006
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective The main procedure of Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty(BET)is inserting catheter into Eustachian tubeostium through nasal cavity, but there is some difficulty in the operation of patients with obvious deviated nasal septum. Therefore, we used a different way to perform BET surgery with a new catheter insertion tool. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and postoperative effects of the two surgical approaches about Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty. Methods After informed consent, 41 patients (26 females, 15 males) with eustachian tube dysfunction were enrolled in the study, aged from 14 to 58 with an average age of 47 years. All patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group of patients underwent BET surgery through nasal cavity, and the other group performed the surgery under 70°endoscope with a new catheter insertion tool via oral approach. The duration of the overall procedure, intraoperative bleeding grade, number of attempts and catheter kinking were recorded and compared. Main outcome measures were based on the Eustachian tube score (ETS) by comparing the changes of ETS scores perioperatively to estimate the recovery of postoperative Eustachian tube funtion. Result All 41 patients underwent 64 BET procedures, while the trans-nasal group of 20 patients underwent 29 cases and the trans-oral group received 35cases. Only one minor nasal bleeding complication occurred in nasal group. The overall mean duration of the procedure was 621 seconds in trans-nasal group and 484 seconds in trans-oral group, with statistically significant differences between the two groups(P=0.012). The mean number of attempts to complete the procedure was 2.15 in trans-nasal group, while 22 cases of the trans-oral group required no repeat attempts. There was a significant statistical difference in the success rate of one-off insertion and average number of attempts among the two groups (P<0.05).The number of catheter kinking (7 cases in trans-nasal group Vs 6 cases in trans-oral group ) and balloon displacement (3 cases in trans-nasal group Vs 1 case in trans-oral group) revealed a statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Six months after the procedure, the Eustachian Tube Score of all patients including the R-values and tympanogram showed a statistically positive outcome (P<0.01). The average Eustachian tube score improved from 3.43 ±2.47 to 7.16 ±2.72 in trans-nasal group and improved from 2.65 ±2.87 to 6.16±3.72 in trans-oral group. Subjective improvement was seen in 76% in trans-nasal group and 81% in trans-oral group. There was no significant difference in early outcome between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic trans-oral Eustachian tube balloon dilation is a novel surgical method. This study demonstrates that trans-oral approach has the several advantages including shorter duration of the procedure, less intraoperative bleeding and higher success rate of one insertion than trans-nasal approach, and no significant adverse effects are encountered. Therefore, the new skill is readily acquired by first-time surgeons.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?